Comparative evaluation of anchorage reinforcement between orthodontic implants and conventional anchorage in orthodontic management of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

Journal Title: Medical Journal Armed Forces - Year 2017, Vol 73, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Increased upper lip procumbency is commonly associated with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with the major goal of reducing maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. The treatment plan usually includes extraction of the maxillary first premolars, followed by retraction of anterior teeth with maximum anchorage. Dental implants have been widely accepted as successful adjuncts for obtaining maximum anchorage in orthodontic treatment. Methods: 50 subjects between the ages of 13 and 17 years having bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. Both groups received treatment with 0.02200 MBT prescription preadjusted edgewise appliance system. In addition, subjects of Group 'I' received the Nance button and lingual arch as anchorage reinforcement in the upper and lower arches, respectively. Subjects of Group 'II' received self-drilling titanium OI for anchorage reinforcement. Results: Significant retraction was achieved in all cases with good vertical control. Anchor loss was observed in both groups. Anchor loss was much higher in Group I compared to Group II, and an intergroup comparison for anchor loss was highly significant. Conclusion: Implants as anchorage, for en masse retraction, can be incorporated into ortho- dontic practice. The use of orthodontic implants for anchorage is a viable alternative to conventional molar anchorage.

Authors and Affiliations

S. S. Chopra

Keywords

Related Articles

Games people play: The next-generation addiction

Over the years, addictive behaviors have gradually extended from substance use to seemingly harmless behaviors. As one said from Parle-G to PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG), a paradigm shift in games to the virtual w...

Scrub typhus: Atypical presentation in subhimalayan region

Scrub typhus is caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi, which is an obligate, intracellular gram-negative coccobacilli and is distributed throughout the Asia Pacific. Scrub typhus is an acute febrile disease characterised by a...

Artemisinin–naphthoquine combination: A directly observed treatment option in malaria

Resistance to standard antimalarials has led to the need for newer options. Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), which require a tedious three-day treatment schedule, have been introduced for the treatment of...

A qualitative study to develop an instrument for initial nurse assessment

Complex health care needs focus on accountability and necessity of inclusion of nurses in documenting and monitoring clinical care plans have brought in the concept of initial nurse assessment and nursing process. Howeve...

Allogenic bone grafts in post-traumatic juxta-articular defects: Need for allogenic bone banking

Allogenic bone banking provide both structural and granular bone grafts for various orthopaedic, spinal, oncological and dental surgeries. However allogenic bones, presently, are not readily available. This article discu...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP623089
  • DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.01.003
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

S. S. Chopra (2017). Comparative evaluation of anchorage reinforcement between orthodontic implants and conventional anchorage in orthodontic management of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Medical Journal Armed Forces, 73(2), 159-166. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-623089