Comparative evaluation of anchorage reinforcement between orthodontic implants and conventional anchorage in orthodontic management of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

Journal Title: Medical Journal Armed Forces - Year 2017, Vol 73, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Increased upper lip procumbency is commonly associated with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with the major goal of reducing maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. The treatment plan usually includes extraction of the maxillary first premolars, followed by retraction of anterior teeth with maximum anchorage. Dental implants have been widely accepted as successful adjuncts for obtaining maximum anchorage in orthodontic treatment. Methods: 50 subjects between the ages of 13 and 17 years having bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. Both groups received treatment with 0.02200 MBT prescription preadjusted edgewise appliance system. In addition, subjects of Group 'I' received the Nance button and lingual arch as anchorage reinforcement in the upper and lower arches, respectively. Subjects of Group 'II' received self-drilling titanium OI for anchorage reinforcement. Results: Significant retraction was achieved in all cases with good vertical control. Anchor loss was observed in both groups. Anchor loss was much higher in Group I compared to Group II, and an intergroup comparison for anchor loss was highly significant. Conclusion: Implants as anchorage, for en masse retraction, can be incorporated into ortho- dontic practice. The use of orthodontic implants for anchorage is a viable alternative to conventional molar anchorage.

Authors and Affiliations

S. S. Chopra

Keywords

Related Articles

Flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia by using ‘‘MRD lite’’ panel

Background: Normal B lymphoid precursors that express CD19, CD10, and/or CD34 are highly sensitive to corticosteroids and after two weeks of remission-induction therapy, they form less than 0.01% of the bone marrow popul...

Use of intrathecal midazolam or fentanyl as an adjunct to spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A randomised controlled study

Background: Intrathecal adjuncts have been used to prolong the quality and duration of subarachnoid anaesthesia. Midazolam given intrathecally is reported to have antinociceptive properties. The purpose of this study was...

Current trends in tuberculosis vaccine

Despite the global efforts made to control tuberculosis (TB) and the large number of available new anti-TB drugs, TB still affects one-third of the world population. The conventional vaccine bacille CalmetteeGuerin (BCG...

Waardenburg syndrome type 2

Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is a rare clinical entity, with the worldwide incidence of 1 in 40,000.1 WS is an autosomal dominant disorder of neural crest cell development. There are 4 variants ofWS, in whichWStype I (WS1)...

Measles, mumps, and rubella: A cross-sectional study of susceptibility to vaccine-preventable diseases among young people in India

Background: Global elimination of vaccine preventable diseases, such as measles, mumps and rubella is a priority. Many countries have reported diminishing of antibody titres against these diseases among young population...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP623089
  • DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.01.003
  • Views 47
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

S. S. Chopra (2017). Comparative evaluation of anchorage reinforcement between orthodontic implants and conventional anchorage in orthodontic management of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Medical Journal Armed Forces, 73(2), 159-166. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-623089