Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiological outcome of trochanteric fracture treated with different intra and extramedullary fixation techniques and intra and extra medullary fixaion devices

Abstract

To compare the clinical and radiological outcome of different Intra and Extramedullary techniques and Extra and Intramedullary fixation devices. Methods Of the 75 participants in this study where we compared, three groups of MIDHS (Minimally invasive DHS) , CDHS (Conventional DHS) Extramedullary fixation and Proximal femoral nailing (Intramedullary fixation). Main outcome measurements were wound size, assessment of blood loss, blood transfusion rate, pain score, operative time and ease of surgery, analgesic consumption, union rate, time to healing, postoperative mobilization of patients, bio mechanical advantages, hospital stay after surgery and complication rate. Results: Postoperatively the MIDHS group and PFN group had significantly smaller wound size, less blood loss, lower blood transfusion rates, pain scores and rates of analgesic consumption, and higher early mobilization rates as compare to Conventional DHS group. There were no significant differences in fracture union rate, time to healing, harris hip score and complications rate between all three groups. Conclusion: MIDHS and PFN fixation of intertrochanteric fractures is effective and safe and significantly reduces blood loss, pain and rehabilitation period, without sacrificing reduction alignment, screw position, fixation stability or bone healing as compare to conventional DHS; however intramedullary implant (PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL) is a better implant than extramedullary implant (DYNAMIC HIP SCREW) for unstable trochantric fractures and have good biomechanical stability.

Authors and Affiliations

R S Bajoriya, shelendra Saiyam, Swami Pravin, Anand Nema

Keywords

Related Articles

Minimal Invasive Dynamic Hip Screw Versus Proximal Femoral Nailing In Treatment Of Inter-Trochanteric Fractures- A Comparative Study

Background: Inter-trochanteric fractures can be managed efficiently by fixation with Proximal femoral nail (PFN) which is intramedullary and has advantages like maintaining controlled impaction, lower rates of implant fa...

Outcome Of Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture In Adults Treated By Open Reduction And Internal Fixation With Volar Buttress Plate

Background: Distal radius fracture with intra-articular extension (AO Type C1, C2 and C3) is a major cause of severe morbidity in patients with upper extremity injuries. Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate...

Comparison of functional outcome between cemented and un-cemented hemiarthroplasty among the elderly patients with fracture neck of femur

Background: The most common treatment for a displaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly is hemiprosthesis. In the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures with hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients the use of bon...

Functional And Radiological Assessment Of Component Position In Total Hip Arthroplasty Using 2D Computed Tomography

Intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most common fractures of the hip especially in the elderly with osteoporotic bones, usually due to low-energy trauma like simple falls. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is still considered...

Computerized Tomographic Morphometric Study Of Last Thoracic And All Lumbar Pedicles In The Indian Population Related To Pedicle Screw Fixation

Transpedicular fixation of the spine with pedicular screws is becoming increasingly popular being more stable and versatile as it provides three dimensional fixations. Several systems of internal fixation that uses the p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP394913
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

R S Bajoriya, shelendra Saiyam, Swami Pravin, Anand Nema (2017). Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiological outcome of trochanteric fracture treated with different intra and extramedullary fixation techniques and intra and extra medullary fixaion devices. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 3(2), 698-704. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-394913