Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Rotary Technique with Piezoelectric Technique in Removal of Impacted Third Molar

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Dental Advancements - Year 2019, Vol 11, Issue 1

Abstract

Context: Surgical removal of impacted third molars is often required to prevent clinical symptoms. While rotary cutting instruments have been traditionally and are still popularly used to remove impacted third molars, they are associated with high rate of pain and post-operative swelling. Piezosurgery is a newer technique that promises greater precision of cuts and lesser post-operative sequelae. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the piezosurgery with rotary techniques in terms of their intraoperative and post-operative effects. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients, within the age of 18–40 years, with asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molars, were selected for the study and randomized into two groups. Group A consisted of 20 patients who underwent surgical extraction with rotary instruments and Group B consisted of 20 patients who underwent surgical extraction done with piezoelectric unit. The intraoperative time taken and tissue destruction was assessed and the post-operative pain, swelling, and trismus were assessed over a follow-up period of 7 days. Results: The mean time of surgery was 27.35 ± (3.1) min in Group A, whereas it was 53.65 ± (2.4) min in Group B. The mean incidence of tissue destruction was 0.8000 ± (0.41) in Group A, whereas it was 0.2000 ± (0.41) in Group B. The mean postoperative pain on day 0 was 5.05 ± (0.69) in Group A and 3.05 ± (0.69) in Group B, on day 3 was 3.20 ± (0.7) in Group A and 1.50 ± (0.69) in Group B, and on day 5 was 2.0 ± (0.73) in Group A and 0.40 ± (0.6) in Group B. On the 3rd postoperative day, mean post-operative swelling 2.51 ± (0.3) cm in Group A and mean post-operative swelling 1.2600 ± (0.28910) cm in Group B. On the 5th post-operative day, mean post-operative swelling was 1.4 ± (0.31) in Group A and 0.5650 ± (0.21095) in Group B. The difference between both groups was found to be statistically significant for all parameters. Conclusion: Although piezosurgery takes more time and is more expensive, the advantages gained in terms of tissue preservation, and decreased pain and swelling make it a superior technique compared to using rotary instruments in impacted third molar.

Authors and Affiliations

Dushyanth S, Pavan Kumar B, Vidya Devi V, Venkatesh V, Praveen P

Keywords

Related Articles

Oral Lichenoid Contact Reaction to a Complete Denture

Oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs) or oral lichenoid reactions (OLRs) share common clinical and histological features to oral lichen planus (OLP). OLRs have sometimes been considered as part of OLP, and have also been describ...

Dental Management of Ectodermal Dysplasia: A Report of Two Cases

Ectodermal dysplasia (ED) is a rare genetic disorder recognized by the failure of the development of two or more ectodermal structures mainly skin, hair, nails, exocrine glands, and teeth. The main two types of ED are ah...

Bilateral Melolabial Flap Reconstruction Post Fibrotomy: A Novel Alternative Option

Melolabial flap previously known as nasolabial flap is a proven reconstructive option for correcting defects of the face preferably of the nose and forehead. Two subtypes based on different pedicles exists namely superio...

Management of Maxillary Anterior Supernumerary Teeth

Supernumerary teeth are the main cause of impaction of upper incisor. Supernumerary teeth when present can cause both esthetic and pathologic problems. Supernumerary teeth in the maxillary midline are common. The present...

Survival of Avulsed Maxillary Incisors Following Delayed Replantation: 3-year Follow-up

A 12-year-old boy had reported with avulsed 11, 12, and 21 after a delay of 12 h. The avulsed teeth were replanted and splinted using an acid-etch composite splint for 4 weeks. Extraoral endodontic therapy was performed...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP600148
  • DOI 10.5866/2019.11.10017
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dushyanth S, Pavan Kumar B, Vidya Devi V, Venkatesh V, Praveen P (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Rotary Technique with Piezoelectric Technique in Removal of Impacted Third Molar. Indian Journal of Dental Advancements, 11(1), 17-21. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-600148