Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Journal Title: Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 10

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is performed as diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Data from a recent meta-analysis suggest that propofol sedation is not associated with an increased risk of complications. Dexmedetomidine can be safely used as a sedoanalgesic agent in colonoscopies because it provides efficient haemodynamic stability, higher satisfaction scores and lower Numeric Rating Scale scores. Under the light of above mentioned data, we planned the present study to compare the efficacy of propofol and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Materials & methods: The present study included comparison of efficacy of propofol and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. A total of 40 patients scheduled to undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in the present study and were broadly divided into two study groups: Group I: 20 Patients receiving propofol, Group II: 20 Patients receiving dexmedetomidine. Modified aldrete score (MAS) was calculated based on the criteria described previously in the literature.8- 10 All the results were analyzed by SPSS software. Results: Mean time to MAS was significantly higher for the propofol group (451.5 seconds) in comparison to the dexmedetomidine group (140.8 seconds). Mean PSS (Patient Satisfaction Score) of subjects of propofol group and dexmedetomidine group was found to be 41 and 43 respectively. However; the difference was found to be statistically non-significant. Conclusion: Although both the analgesic agents were statistically equally effective, efficacy of dexmedetomidine might be more in patients undergoing endoscopy.

Authors and Affiliations

Anil Bhati

Keywords

Related Articles

Effect Of Local Periodontal Treatment Alone And In Combination With Systemic Doxycycline Therapy On Glycaemic Control In Patients With Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Evidence consistently shows that Periodontal infection may adversely affect glycaemic control in people with diabetes. In the light of this background this study aims to examine the effects of non-surgical p...

A Clinical Study on Fronto Nasal Flap for Nasal Tip Reconstruction: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Reconstruction of any part of face and oral cavity is always very challenging to any concerned specialty and it should involve a team of specialists from different specialties to overcome the problems faced while doing a...

Immediate Loading in Implants

Purpose- Dental implants have proven to be a predictable and successful treatment modality which provide optimum esthetics and function even in patients with compromised alveolar ridges which were previously difficult to...

Mucosal copper and zinc levels in oral submucous fibrosis patients

Background: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic debilitating disease and a premalignant condition of the oral cavity. Of late, a renewed interest in the role of copper and zinc as a mediator of fibrosis in OSMF h...

Lasers in Dentistry- A Literature Review

Laser is one of the most captivating technologies in dental practice. Even though, introduced as an alternative to the traditional halogen curing light, the laser now has become the instrument of choice, in many dental a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP550019
  • DOI -
  • Views 74
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anil Bhati (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 6(10), 120-123. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-550019