Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal Magnification on Digital and Conventional Panoramic Images

Journal Title: IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess horizontal magnification on digital and panoramic radiographs and compare the magnification factor between the two. Materials and Methods: 30 digital and 30 conventional panoramic radiographs of 30 healthy adults were taken. Impressions were made of all the patients and casts were poured. With the calipers maximum mesiodistal width of labial/buccal surface of teeth were measured and horizontal magnification was calculated for incisor, premolar and molar teeth. Statistical analysis: ANOVA test followed by post hoc Tukey Multiple comparison test T were used. Data was analyzed using SPSS software 16.0 V. Results: It was observed that in comparison to the measurement on the casts the digital and conventional panoramic radiographs showed significant difference of mean magnification of horizontal dimensions (p<0.001) except for maxillary anteriors in digital images (p>0.05). Further compared to digital imaging conventional images showed significant difference of mean horizontal magnification (p<0.0001). The panoramic radiographs showed significant higher magnification index than listed by the manufacturer for both panoramic machines. Conclusion: We conclude that both digital and conventional panoramic images show horizontal magnification, further the horizontal magnification of conventional images is significantly higher than their digital counterparts. Hence horizontal panoramic measurements are unreliable.

Authors and Affiliations

Patil Prashant B, S Anusuya G.

Keywords

Related Articles

Use of deproteinizer to eliminate interference of high bilirubin on measurement of serum creatinine by the kinetic jaffe reaction

Introduction: Serum creatinine is a useful diagnostic parameter of kidney function. Its concentration reflects glomerular filtration rate. Because of negative interference of bilirubin over creatinine level, may mislead...

Visual hemolysis Index for routine clinical chemistry laboratory parameters

Introduction: Interference substances can be significance source of error in the clinical laboratory measurements. Such errors may, in some cases represents hazards in patients. Hemolysis interferes with the Clinical Che...

Comparative morphometric analysis of soft palate between OSMF and normal individuals: A digital cephalometric study

Aim: To investigate morphometric variation of the soft palate on lateral cephalogram in different stages of. Oral submucous fibrosis. Objectives: To evaluate the radiographic velum length, velum width, angle/inclination...

Orofacial manifestations of Robinow syndrome: A rare case report

Robinow syndrome (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM - 268310) is an extremely rare genetic disorder with characteristic skeletal deformities and orofacial dysmorphism (fetal facies). The purpose of the present ca...

Morphometric evaluation of the styloid process of the temporal bone as an aid in age and sex discrimination – A retrospective digital panaromic study

Introduction Maxillofacial radiology plays a significant role in forensic anthropology for age and sex discrimination in case of mass disasters Anatomically Styloid process is bony structure cylindrical in shape arises f...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP243368
  • DOI -
  • Views 129
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Patil Prashant B, S Anusuya G. (2016). Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal Magnification on Digital and Conventional Panoramic Images. IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging, 2(1), 1-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-243368