Comparative evaluation of microhardness between giomer, compomer, composite and resin-modified GIC

Journal Title: International Dental Journal of Student Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

Aim Aim of this study was to evaluate microhardness of a relatively new material Giomer as compared to other commonly used resin based restoratives Compomer Hybrid Composite and Resin modified glass ionomer RMGICMaterial and MethodsTen sample discs were made from each of the four restorative materials using stainless steel moulds The surface microhardness of the Giomer Compomer Hybrid Composite and RMGIC were measured on each side using a Vickers microhardness tester at a magnification 500X A 100g load with a holding time of 15 seconds was used for all the samples The size of the indentations was used to measure the microhardness of the test materialsStatistical AnalysisThe data was analysed using the oneway ANOVA Analysis of variance test The result is considered statistically significant if the p value obtained is ResultsThe microhardness of all the four materials differed significantly from each other pConclusionThe order of hardness from highest to lowest is as follows Giomer Composite RMGIC CompomerKeywordsGiomer Resin based restorative materials Vickers Hardness Test

Authors and Affiliations

R. Sreevatsan, Mukundan Vijayan, Rini Rajendran

Keywords

Related Articles

Diagnosis of HIV infection using rapid oral fluid detection kit and evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy – a case control study

Method: The informed consent was obtained and samples were collected from two groups. Each group consists of 60 samples. The first group involved known HIV positive patients. The second group involved the control group o...

Cephalometric evaluation of the Assamese young adults using Tweed’s analysis

The cephalometric norms of different ethnic and racial groups established in various studies show that normal measurements for one group are not necessarily normal for another group each racial group must be treated acco...

Expression of toll like receptor 4 and cluster of differentiation 14 in chronic periodontitis patients- an immunohistochemical study

Introduction: Toll like receptors along with their co receptors contribute an essential task in immune and destruction mechanism. The aim of the present study was expression of Toll like receptor 4 and Cluster of differe...

Biomechanical implications of rotation correction in orthodontics: Case series

According to Bacetti 1998 tooth rotation is defined as observable mesiolingual or distolingual intraalveolar displacement of the tooth around its longitudinal axis1 Tooth rotations cause difficulty in finishing fixed ort...

Response of lycopene in treatment of oral submucous fibrosis

Introduction: Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSF) is a well-known precancerous condition with malignant transformation rate as high as 7.6%. It results in marked rigidity of oral cavity and an eventual inability to open the mo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP516926
  • DOI 10.18231/2278-3784.2018.0015
  • Views 128
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

R. Sreevatsan, Mukundan Vijayan, Rini Rajendran (2018). Comparative evaluation of microhardness between giomer, compomer, composite and resin-modified GIC. International Dental Journal of Student Research, 6(3), 61-65. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-516926