Comparative evaluation of microhardness between giomer, compomer, composite and resin-modified GIC

Journal Title: International Dental Journal of Student Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

Aim Aim of this study was to evaluate microhardness of a relatively new material Giomer as compared to other commonly used resin based restoratives Compomer Hybrid Composite and Resin modified glass ionomer RMGICMaterial and MethodsTen sample discs were made from each of the four restorative materials using stainless steel moulds The surface microhardness of the Giomer Compomer Hybrid Composite and RMGIC were measured on each side using a Vickers microhardness tester at a magnification 500X A 100g load with a holding time of 15 seconds was used for all the samples The size of the indentations was used to measure the microhardness of the test materialsStatistical AnalysisThe data was analysed using the oneway ANOVA Analysis of variance test The result is considered statistically significant if the p value obtained is ResultsThe microhardness of all the four materials differed significantly from each other pConclusionThe order of hardness from highest to lowest is as follows Giomer Composite RMGIC CompomerKeywordsGiomer Resin based restorative materials Vickers Hardness Test

Authors and Affiliations

R. Sreevatsan, Mukundan Vijayan, Rini Rajendran

Keywords

Related Articles

“A novel impression technique for recording bilateral severe undercuts with rigid impression materials in completely edentulous patients”

Completely edentulous patients who present hard tissue undercuts along with overlying soft tissue, especially after extraction of proclined natural teeth find their treatment prosthesis deferred for months, especially in...

Expression of toll like receptor 4 and cluster of differentiation 14 in chronic periodontitis patients- an immunohistochemical study

Introduction: Toll like receptors along with their co receptors contribute an essential task in immune and destruction mechanism. The aim of the present study was expression of Toll like receptor 4 and Cluster of differe...

Prevalence of Aggressive Periodontitis in patients visiting Ajman University Dental Clinics – Radiographic Study

Objectives: The aim of this research project was to determine the prevalence of aggressive periodontitis cases in patients visiting Ajman University dental clinics and to determine the prevalence of Aggressive periodonti...

Cephalometric evaluation of the Assamese young adults using Tweed’s analysis

The cephalometric norms of different ethnic and racial groups established in various studies show that normal measurements for one group are not necessarily normal for another group each racial group must be treated acco...

The contribution of collagen matrix in apexification with MM-MTA®

The absence of an apical constriction and the divergent apical architecture of the root canal hamper complete debridement, canal disinfection and obturation. In the past, calcium hydroxide was currently used to create a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP516926
  • DOI 10.18231/2278-3784.2018.0015
  • Views 122
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

R. Sreevatsan, Mukundan Vijayan, Rini Rajendran (2018). Comparative evaluation of microhardness between giomer, compomer, composite and resin-modified GIC. International Dental Journal of Student Research, 6(3), 61-65. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-516926