Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions Using 3 Different Impression Materials Analyzed Immediately, After 24 Hours & After 2 Pours – An In-Vitro Study.

Abstract

Objectives: The accuracy of the definitive cast to a large extent is dependent on the impression technique, impression material, splinting (if used), and cast material in order to achieve passively fitting implant – retained prosthesis. This in vitro study aimed to comparatively evaluate the dimensional accuracy of multiple implant impressions using 3 different impression materials assessed at various time intervals. Materials and methods: 3 groups using Addition Silicone, Condensation Silicone and polyether impression materials were further divided into 2 subgroups each, as splinted open and non-splinted closed tray in each group. Thus, 90 impressions were made with the splinted open tray impression technique using perforated rigid custom made trays and dental floss and pattern resin as splinting materials, and 90 with non-splinted closed tray technique using perforated metal stock trays. Measurements of the inter-implant distances on the working casts in three dimensions were obtained by rapid photometer and the differences calculated in relation to the reference model. Results: The dimensional accuracy of Addition Silicone elastomeric impression material was significantly better at immediate and after 24 hour pour followed by Polyether and least for Condensation Silicone(P<0.001). On the other hand, after 2 pours the dimensional accuracy of Polyether was significantly better followed by Addition Silicone and least for Condensation Silicone. (P<0.001) Conclusion: Addition Silicone was the better impression material followed by polyether for a situation of multiple implants. Polyether was stable and suitable for multiple pours. The open tray was better for a situation of multiple implants than closed tray impression technique.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Karunakar Shetty

Keywords

Related Articles

Endodontic Management of Maxillary Premolar Using Metapex And 2% Chlorhexidine As Intracanal Medicaments.

Repeated failures of Root canal treatment (RCT) teeth make us think for surgical management. This case report presents retreatment of a root canal treated case. Patient reported with history of undergoing root canal trea...

Etiology and Treatment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions.

Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) present loss of dental structure in the cervical region as a clinical characteristic, predisposing the patient to functional problems, aesthetic and symptoms of dentinal hypersensitivi...

A Survey for Evaluating the Awarness, Knowledge and Perception of Various Treatment Modalities forReplacement of Missing Teeth.

Aim: To assess the general awareness of the various treatment modalities for replacement of missing teeth among individuals and their choice of treatment. Methodology: A survey was conducted among...

Evolutionary Changes In The Jaws And Teeth Of Homo Sapiens – In A Nutshell.

Over the course of the evolutionary journey, the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species in the human family is relatively a new thing. The rise of this intellectually superior species also came along with a chan...

Effect of Pogostemon Parviflavus Leaves Extracts against Candida Albicans.

Introduction: Oral Carcinoma (SCC) is the result of a multistage process from normal to dysplastic lesions. A premalignant or precancerous lesion is defined by the World Health Organization as...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP578379
  • DOI -
  • Views 58
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Karunakar Shetty (2019). Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions Using 3 Different Impression Materials Analyzed Immediately, After 24 Hours & After 2 Pours – An In-Vitro Study.. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR), 2(2), 368-377. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-578379