Comparative morphometric analysis of soft palate between OSMF and normal individuals: A digital cephalometric study

Journal Title: IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Aim: To investigate morphometric variation of the soft palate on lateral cephalogram in different stages of. Oral submucous fibrosis. Objectives: To evaluate the radiographic velum length, velum width, angle/inclination of velum and pharnygeal depth divided by velum length giving Need’s ratio in different morphological types of soft palate and different stages of OSMF and to determine correlation of all metric parameters with respect to staging of OSMF. Also, correlation of staging of OSMF with respect to different types of soft palate was evaluated. Materials & Method: Lateral cephalographs of 80 cases with age range 18-45years irrespective of gender were evaluated. Soft palatal patterns were categorized based on You et al. et al’s classification & staging of OSMF was done according to Kiran Kumar et al’s classification. Total 80 cases were divided into two groups such as Group A (OSMF = 40) and Group B (Control =40) Group A (40 OSMF) and Group B (40 Control). The length, width, angle of inclination and need’s ratio was evaluated in each type of soft palate. Mann-Whitney est and Kruskal Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean age of the 80 cases was 40.5years. The highest incidence of soft palate seen in group A and B was type 1, whereas the lowest incidence was type 5 in Group A and type 6 in Group B. The mean and Standard deviation of length, width, angle of inclination and need’s ratio in group A was 22.43 + 0.76, 23.91 + 0.94, 127.72° + 1.21 and 0.8+ 0.57 respectively and that of control group was 24.47 + 1.10, 21.60 + 0.58, 131.6° + 0.75 and 0.63+ 0.97 respectively. Stage 1 OSMF subjects had maximum type 2 soft palate(4%), Stage 2 had type 1 (45%) and stage 3 had type 6 (5%). Conclusion: With OSMF staging advancement, length and angle of inclination of soft palate shows negative, whereas width and the need’s ratio shows positive correlation.

Authors and Affiliations

Ashwini Nerkar, Rajeev Gadgil, Ajay Bhoosreddy, Chetan Bhadage, Priyanka Vedpathak

Keywords

Related Articles

Our Experience with Submandibular Swellings

The Submandibular Gland lies in Submandibular triangle(1). Submandibular swellings are not so common. They constitute 3% of all the neoplasms, 60% of which are benign(2). In this study the incidence, relationship of clin...

Cone beam computed tomography for Maxillary sinus vascular anatomy

As well described by all anatomists, the vessels of nose region, maxilla and sinus walls constitute a rich network of arteries and veins. Branches of the ophthalmic, maxillary and facial arteries supply the nose. They fo...

Bilateral Tonsillolith – An incidental finding

A calcified mass within the tonsil is called as Tonsillolith and it is a relatively rare entity commonly found in the tonsillar crypt. They are usually single and unilateral, but occasionally may be multiple or bilateral...

Percutaneous CT guided needle aspiration of a life threatening deep neck space infection of dental origin

Deep neck space infection can lead to a life threatening situation if not treated on time. The best prognosis can be achieved when the treatment is early, limiting the complexity of the situation and using minimally inva...

Diagnostic validity of ultrasonogaraphy in zygomatic arch fractures: A clinical study

Objective: The Objective of the present study was to investigate the uses of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of zygomatic arch fractures and to identify the acoustic pattern between ultrasound image and true morphology...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP302627
  • DOI 10.18231/2455-6750.2017.0001
  • Views 91
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ashwini Nerkar, Rajeev Gadgil, Ajay Bhoosreddy, Chetan Bhadage, Priyanka Vedpathak (2017). Comparative morphometric analysis of soft palate between OSMF and normal individuals: A digital cephalometric study. IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging, 3(1), 1-7. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-302627