Comparative Study between Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Microdebrider & Conventional Techniques with Its Impact on Pulmonary Function Tests - A Randomized Control Trial

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 11

Abstract

The nasal airways and their close association to paranasal sinuses are an integral part of the Respiratory Tract. Mucociliary clearance is the predominant clearance mechanism for both upper and lower airways. The two components of mucociliary clearance are cilia and the secretions above them. It is known that CRS coexists in as many as 40–75% of patients with BA. Treatment options for CRS include medical therapy, surgical intervention or both. According to recent guidelines, ESS is the most favourable surgical approach in patients who fail to respond adequately to medical therapy. To assess the extent of improvement in CRS following ESS (either microdebrider or conventional) and if it brings an improvement in the Pulmonary Function Tests. This also assesses symptom scores, endoscopic appearances and CT findings pre-operatively and post-operatively. This study was carried out at the outpatient Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery in Meenakshi Medical College, Hospital & Research Institute, Tamil Nadu. Patients were consented and started on medical treatment with systemic steroids for two weeks and topical nasal steroids for one month. If the disease persisted after medical therapy, patients were equally randomized into two groups of 30 each - microdebrider and conventional technique. Subjective symptoms of CRS were based on the CRS criteria. Symptoms score were given with Lund-Mckay symptoms scoring, pre-operatively one week before and post-operatively two months after surgery. Lund–Mckay CT Scoring System separately assessed the extent of opacification of sinuses. PFT was assessed using Spirometer (KOKO Legend). There was a statistically considerable difference in the FEV1 values in microdebrider ESS than conventional ESS. Microdebrider ESS is considered superior when we have to address the co-existence of lower airway diseases along with CRS.

Authors and Affiliations

Muthubabu K.

Keywords

Related Articles

Evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and hormonal receptor expression patterns in breast cancer from fine needle aspiration cytology

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, accounting for 22% of all female cancers. In breast cancer, the overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2/neu) is a prognostic ma...

Unilateral Proptosis A Rare Presentation of Posterior Ethmoidal Sinus Mucocele

Paranasal sinus mucoceles are epithelium-lined cystic masses usually resulting from obstruction of sinus ostia. They most frequently occur in the frontal and ethmoid sinuses. While ophthalmologic symptoms are most common...

A Study on the Variations in the Renal Artery

Background: Kidneys derive its blood supply from renal artery (RA), usually single in origin, a branch of abdominal aorta. Variations in the arterial supply of kidney is more frequently encountered during laproscopic or...

Correlating the Severity of Chronic Kidney Disease with Oral Health: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as a progressive and most often, irreversible decline in renal function. Changes in the oral cavity, such as periodontitis, oral candidiasis, xerostomia, halitosis, den...

Seizure Semiology and Imaging Correlation

Seizure is defined as paroxysmal event due to abnormal excessive hyper synchronus discharges from an aggregate of CNS neurons. Although variety of factors influence the incidence and prevalence of seizure, approximately...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP510898
  • DOI -
  • Views 40
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Muthubabu K. (2018). Comparative Study between Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Microdebrider & Conventional Techniques with Its Impact on Pulmonary Function Tests - A Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 6(11), 781-787. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-510898