Comparative Study between Exteriorization of Uterus during Cesarean Section Versus Intraperitoneal or in-Situ Repair

Journal Title: Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 7

Abstract

The objectives of this study is to assess intraoperative and postoperative advantages and disadvantages following exteriorization of uterus as compared to those with intraperitoneal or in-situ repair and to assess intraoperative and immediate postoperative morbidity following exteriorization of uterus as compared to in-situ repair. In this randomized controlled, prospective study 100 women planned for LSCS were included. The women were randomly assigned to two groups, exteriorization group and in-situ group. Variables analysed were intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and immediate postoperative nausea and vomiting, intraoperative pain, postoperative pain, postoperative analgesic requirement, postoperative fever morbidity, perioperative fall in hemoglobin and wound infection. There was significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. Blood loss being less in exteriorization group. P value was < 0.0014. There was significant difference in the operating time. Exteriorization required less time as compared to in-situ group. P value was <0.0001. There was significant difference in perioperative fall in haemoglobin. The fall in haemoglobin was less in exteriorization group. P value was < 0.0001. There was no significant difference in the intra-operative and post-operative nausea, vomiting , intraoperative pain, postoperative pain , postoperative analgesic requirement, postoperative febrile morbidity and wound infection between the two groups. Uterine exteriorization is a valuable technique in uterine repair in caesarean section, in terms of better visualization of scar. There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss and less fall in perioperative haemoglobin in exteriorization group. The operating time was also shorter in exteriorization group. Keywords: Uterine repair, exteriorization, caesarean section, in-situ repair.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. K. K. Das, Dr. Javed Ali, Dr. Sourabha N

Keywords

Related Articles

Tragal Perichondrium vs. Temporalisfascia in Myringoplasty: A Comparative Study

Abstract:Use of temporalis fascia or tragal perichondrium in myringoplasty is a well known entity sins long time. No proper data available for comparison of temporal fascia vstragalperichondrium in myringoplasty. The obj...

Assessment of Serum Levels of Bone Metabolism Biomarkers in Sudanese with HIV Infection

Bone metabolism disorders with increased fractures rate are common among HIV infected patients. This study was aimed to assess serum levels of bone metabolism biomarkers in Sudanese HIV infected patients. In a Hospital...

VerrucousHemangioma: A diagnosis to consider

Abstract: VerrucousHemangioma (VH) is a vascular malformation and may be consider as one of the variants of either capillary or cavernous hemangioma. Although invariably present at birth, VH may appear later, even in adu...

Study of Pulmonary Function Test, Oxidative Stress Marker and Non-enzymatic Antioxidants in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Abstract: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a health problem with increasing severity, as exposure to risk factors such as cigarette smoke, pollution is inevitable. Oxidant antioxidant imbalance cause oxida...

Severity and Associated Risk Factors Leading to Depressive Symptoms in the Post-Partum Period: A Cross Sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Depression significantly contributes to the global disease burden. It is important to identify maternal depression in India since death rates due to suicide, a large proportion of which occur in women, are among the high...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP373767
  • DOI -
  • Views 42
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. K. K. Das, Dr. Javed Ali, Dr. Sourabha N (2015). Comparative Study between Exteriorization of Uterus during Cesarean Section Versus Intraperitoneal or in-Situ Repair. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 3(7), 2724-2728. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-373767