Comparative Study of Minimal Invasive Procedure for Haemorrhoids vs Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy in Management of Haemorrhoids

Journal Title: New Indian Journal of Surgery - Year 2018, Vol 9, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: Till recently Milligan – Morgan haemorrhoidectomy i.e. conventional or open haemorrhoidectomy is the most popular surgical treatment for haemorrhoids. With the advent of minimal invasive surgery, the scenario has changed. More recently, stapler haemorrhoidectomy is becoming popular as a day care procedure with minimal post-operative pain and early return to work. Aim: The present study is designed to compare make a comparative assessment of the Stapled haemorrhoidectomy against Conventional haemorrhoidectomy in the surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Material and Methods: A hospital based Non-randomised comparative study was conducted in Dept. of Surgery of at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 50 eligible cases scheduled for haemorrhoidectomy in our hospital were included in the study. These 50 patients were then divided into two groups i.e. 25 for stapled procedure and other 25 patients for conventional procedure. Results: Mean operative time was significantly less in stapler group (39.12 vs 45.75 mins; p<0.01) while mean hospital stay was significantly longer in conventional surgery group (7.02 vs 3.01 days; p<0.01). Post-op complain of pain, immediately after surgery (6 hrs.) and at day 1 and day 3 was significantly less in stapler group (p<0.01). Post-op complications after conventional surgery include bleeding (28%), urinary retention (12%), wound infection, anal incontinence (8% each) and anal stenosis (4%). Complications of stapler surgery include bleeding (16%) and urinary retention (4%). Mean time for return to work was significantly less in stapler group as compared to conventional surgery group (4.91 vs 13.8 days; p<0.01). Conclusion: Stapler haemorrhoidectomy requires less operative time, reduces hospital stay and decreases post-operative pain. Return to normal activity is also significantly faster with stapler surgery.

Authors and Affiliations

Chirag Parikh

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of Abdominal Tuberculosis in Surgical Patients

Tuberculosis of gastrointestinal tract is the sixth most frequent form of extra pulmonary involvment, following lymphatic, genitourinary, bones and joints, miliary and meningeal tuberculsois. 5% tuberculosis patients hav...

Retrospective Study of Open Surgical Suture for Duodenal Ulcer Perforation in 8 Years

Du perforation is common complication of PUD. Patients needs prompt resuscitation and surgical suturing of perforation. Mortality rate [1] is 15.2% and morbidity [1] is 5.2%. But mortality is low in early diagnosis & pro...

Entrocutanaeous Fistula in Patients undergoing Exploratory Laparotomy as Emergency Surgery: Five Years Experience

A fistula is an abnormal connection between two epitheleal surfaces. Enterocutaneous fistula could result from intestinal disease extending to adjacent viscira, extraintestinal diease spreading to intestines, injury to i...

Evaluation of Efficacy of Foam Sclerotherapy in Treating Truncal and Perforator Reflex: A One Year Prospective Hospital Based Study

Background: Veins varicose are the most common condition which affects the 30% of the adult population. This can be seen more in males than females. The present study aim is to see the efficacy of foam slerotherapy in tr...

A Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients

Objectives: Three groups were compared on basis of postoperative symptoms and complications and overall duration of hospital stay to assess the role and rationale of use of antibiotics in patients undergoing Laparoscopic...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP548147
  • DOI 10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.9418.23
  • Views 89
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Chirag Parikh (2018). Comparative Study of Minimal Invasive Procedure for Haemorrhoids vs Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy in Management of Haemorrhoids. New Indian Journal of Surgery, 9(4), 516-523. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-548147