Comparative Study of Preloading with Ringer Lactate and Intravenous Ephedrine for Prevention of Hypotention during Propofol Induction in Patient Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery under General Anaesthesia.

Abstract

Background: Propofol is ideal induction agent for short and ambulatory surgical procedures requiring general anaesthesia, as recovery is rapid with fewer unwanted side effects, such as drowsiness on recovery, disorientation and nausea, when compared with other agents such as Thiopentone. In this study compared the efficacy of preloading with Ringer Lactate (crystalloid) with IV Ephedrine Sulfate (Vasoconstrictor) in prevention of hypotension during Propofol induction. Method: Prospective, randomised observational study including 90 patients of ASA physical status I and II, 20 to 50 yrs age of both gender, scheduled for elective abdominal surgery, were assigned by pre randomized, sealed envelopes into three study groups and receive the following: Group C(n=30) :inj. Propofol (2mg/kg),Group E(n=30):inj. Propofol (2mg/kg) and inj.Ephedrine 70 ug/kg, Group RL(n=30): inj.Propofol (2mg/kg) and inj. Ringer Lactate(10ml/kg). Heart rate, Blood pressure (SBP,DBP,MAP) were recorded before induction (baseline) and immediate, 01min.,03min., 05min.post induction. Results: Preoperative Ephedrine Sulphate failed to prevent the delayed post induction hypotension and led to excessive increase in the heart rate that may not be tolerated in the high risk patients. On the other hand, preoperative volume loading with 10ml/kg Ringer Lactate over 10-15 min successfully antagonised Propofol induced hypotension without increments in the heart rate. Therefore, volume loading with Ringer's Lactate provides more haemodynamic stability than the pre-induction administration of Ephedrine Sulphate. Conclusion: Preoperative Ephedrine Sulphate failed to prevent the delayed post induction hypotension and led to excessive increase in the heart rate that may not be tolerated in the high risk patients.

Authors and Affiliations

Sunil Agarwal

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Abilities of Different Materials as Barriers to Coronal and Apical Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method-An In Vitro Study

Introduction: The main objective of root canal filling is to obturate the entire root canal system and provide an impervious apical and coronal seal. Incomplete obturation and sealing may cause penetra...

Gorlin-Goltz Syndrome: A case report

Gorlin -Goltz syndrome or Jaw cyst-basal cell nevus-bifid rib syndrome involves multi organ systems. The most common findings are multiple odontogenic keratocysts in the jaws and basal cell nevi on the skin that have an...

Role of transfusion in dengue patients

Introduction: Dengue is rapidly spreading arbovirus infection caused by Dengue virus and transmitted by aedes aegypti mosquito. Every year during dengue outbreak there is immense pressure on transfusion facilities to mee...

A Study on Occurrence of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients with Febrile Seizures Presenting To Pediatric Hospital, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

Introduction: Febrile Seizures (F.S) and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are disorders of the central nervous system and share common risk factors. The relationship between two remains enigmatic. There is...

A Study of Dexmedetomidine Vs Tramadol for Post Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries.

Background: Spinal procedures are generally associated with intense pain in the initial postoperative period. Adequate pain management in this period has been seen to correlate well with improved functional outcome, earl...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP574498
  • DOI -
  • Views 98
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sunil Agarwal (2019). Comparative Study of Preloading with Ringer Lactate and Intravenous Ephedrine for Prevention of Hypotention during Propofol Induction in Patient Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery under General Anaesthesia.. International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR), 4(5), 115-121. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-574498