Comparative study of USG guided aspiration and non-aspiration cytology for evaluation of specimen quality and diagnostic accuracy in abdominal and pelvic lumps
Journal Title: Pathology Update: Tropical Journal of Pathology and Microbiology - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 7
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of USG guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with that of fine needle non aspiration cytology (FNNAC) in abdominal, pelvic masses. Objectives: Although a large volume of data is available to compare FNAC and FNNAC sampling in superficial lesions, very less literature is available regarding FNNAC for abdominal and pelvic masses. Therefore we have directly compared the diagnostic accuracy and specimen quality of both techniques FNAC and FNNAC under guidance of ultrasound in intra abdominal and pelvic mass lesions. Method: Samples were obtained by applying both FNAC and FNNAC techniques for abdominal, pelvic lumps of 71 patients who attended the pathology department of BRD Medical College Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. The sampling procedure were done by single operator, smears made from FNAC and FNNAC techniques were studied using a objective scoring system based on the background blood or clot, amount of cellular material, degree of cellular degeneration, degree of cellular trauma and retention of appropriate architecture and then comparison of diagnosed case was done with histopathology. Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy was 85.9% in FNAC and 83.0% in FNNAC(p=0.80).Diagnostic accuracy by FNAC are 83.3%,92.8%,91.6% in cases of liver,gallbladder and ovary respectively. In cases of G.I.T masses it is 81.9% by FNAC.Diagnostic accuracy by FNNAC it is maximum 93.4% in cases of liver masses and lower in ovarian masses (66.6%) when compared with the histopathology. A statistically insignificant difference was recorded in sampling technique score for quality of smears in all cases except in the liver where the FNNAC score was statistically significant. Conclusion: Although both techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages but diagnostic accuracy was much better by FNAC than FNNAC but quality of smears for cytodiagnosis was superior by FNNAC technique than FNAC in all abdominal, pelvic masses.
Authors and Affiliations
Archana Bundela, Alpana Bundela, Shilpa U. Vahikar, Kanchan Srivastava
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP499774
- DOI 10.17511/ jopm. 2018.i7.03
- Views 112
- Downloads 0
An analysis of skin appendageal tumors: 10 year study
Introduction: Skin appendageal tumors are wide spectrum of disorders that differentiate towards one or more adnexal structures. Objective: To determine the prevalence of skin appengeal tumours. Materials and methods: Thi...
Histopathogical study of dermatological lesions in HIV reactive patients
Background: Skin lesions are commonly encountered in HIV patients (>90%). Several skin diseases have proved to be sensitive and useful indicators of progression of HIV infection. Although these conditions may be seen in...
A study of leukemias Profile in central India
Introduction: Leukemia was considered as a rare disease few years back. However, it is increasing in incidence and prevalence slowly and steadily. Leukemias are euplastic proliferations of haematopoietic cells and form a...
Retrospective analysis of head and neck masses diagnosed by cytology in a tertiary care centre
Introduction: Fine Needle Biopsy of head and neck masses as a minimally invasive technique is particularly suitable in this sensitive area where an incisional biopsy can cause problems. A cytological diagnosis of a non-n...
Clinicopathological profile of cholecystectomy specimens-a retrospective and prospective study
Objectives: To study the magnitude of lesions in gallbladder and to study different types of histopathological lesions occurring in the gallbladder and to co-relate them clinicopathologically.Design and Methods: Cholecys...