Comparing results of Endoscopic microdiscectomy and conventional discectomy for lumbar disc disease: A short term study

Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic lumbo-sacral pain is a common and challenging clinical entity in pain management centre. The most commonly involved surgical indication are intractable leg or back pain and significant functional impairment that have been unresponsive to conservative measures. This is a level 2 evidence study where we have studied results of endoscopic discectomy and compared it to conventional discectomy procedure. Material and Methods: We selected 40 patients with severe low back pain radiating to one or both lower limbs, which has failed to resolve after prolonged conservative treatment and have less than level 3 disc prolapse. Oswestry Disability Index (For Low Back Pain) was recorded with questionnaire response and used as clinical tool for assessment. Results: Mean age of 40 patients was found to be 42.9 year with 80% patients having paracentral disc protrusion. Average operative time for endoscopic discectomy was 103 minutes which was higher than conventional discectomy (78 minutes). However, there was minimal blood loss compared to conventional discectomy. Based on ODI score, both endoscopic and conventional discectomy offered similar results in all grades. Conclusion: Endoscopic discectomy is a novel, safe and effective method that minimizes invasiveness of the surgical approach. Results achieved with this method are comparable to those achieved with open discectomy in terms of relief of symptoms on longer follow up, and is significantly better in terms of early mobilisation and morbidity as there is minimal tissue trauma.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Padmanabh Vora, Dr. Parth Thaker, Dr. Jeet Gandhi, Dr. Yash Gupta, Dr. Himanshu Panchal, Dr. Mukund Prabhakar

Keywords

Related Articles

Functional outcome of arthroscopic subacromial decompression in primary shoulder impingement syndrome due to extrinsic mechanical causes

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of arthroscopic subacromial decompression in primary shoulder impingement due to secondary mechanical causes in terms of functional outcome. Materials and M...

Role of hybrid external fixator in proximal tibial fractures: A prospective analysis

Introduction: The proximal tibial fractures are associated with high energy trauma and present with difficulty in treatment due to poor skin condition. In our study, we have operated 32 patients with hybrid external fixa...

A comparative study of displaced midshaft clavicle fracture managed by precontoured locking compression plates and titanium elastic nails

Background: Results of conservatively managed mid-shaft clavicle fractures are not as good as previously thought. This has lead to increasing interest in primary fixation of these fractures. There are two main techniques...

Functional outcome of proximal femoral nailing in inter trochanteric fractures of femur: A prospective study

Background: The study was conducted to analyse the functional outcome of Proximal Femoral Nailing in Inter-Trochanteric Fractures of Femur. Methods: Over two years, after obtaining written consent, this prospective study...

Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in distal tibia fractures-retrospective functional and radiological outcome analysis among rural population

Background: Distal tibia fractures are one of the common fractures and results from indirect coronal or direct axial compression forces. These fractures encompass many and varied fracture configurations that involve medi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP555232
  • DOI 10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i1a.06
  • Views 115
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Padmanabh Vora, Dr. Parth Thaker, Dr. Jeet Gandhi, Dr. Yash Gupta, Dr. Himanshu Panchal, Dr. Mukund Prabhakar (2019). Comparing results of Endoscopic microdiscectomy and conventional discectomy for lumbar disc disease: A short term study. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 5(1), 30-33. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-555232