Comparing results of Endoscopic microdiscectomy and conventional discectomy for lumbar disc disease: A short term study

Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic lumbo-sacral pain is a common and challenging clinical entity in pain management centre. The most commonly involved surgical indication are intractable leg or back pain and significant functional impairment that have been unresponsive to conservative measures. This is a level 2 evidence study where we have studied results of endoscopic discectomy and compared it to conventional discectomy procedure. Material and Methods: We selected 40 patients with severe low back pain radiating to one or both lower limbs, which has failed to resolve after prolonged conservative treatment and have less than level 3 disc prolapse. Oswestry Disability Index (For Low Back Pain) was recorded with questionnaire response and used as clinical tool for assessment. Results: Mean age of 40 patients was found to be 42.9 year with 80% patients having paracentral disc protrusion. Average operative time for endoscopic discectomy was 103 minutes which was higher than conventional discectomy (78 minutes). However, there was minimal blood loss compared to conventional discectomy. Based on ODI score, both endoscopic and conventional discectomy offered similar results in all grades. Conclusion: Endoscopic discectomy is a novel, safe and effective method that minimizes invasiveness of the surgical approach. Results achieved with this method are comparable to those achieved with open discectomy in terms of relief of symptoms on longer follow up, and is significantly better in terms of early mobilisation and morbidity as there is minimal tissue trauma.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Padmanabh Vora, Dr. Parth Thaker, Dr. Jeet Gandhi, Dr. Yash Gupta, Dr. Himanshu Panchal, Dr. Mukund Prabhakar

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative study of EUSOL and Silverstream in healing of pressure sore in traumatic spinal cord injury patients

Pressure sore is among the most common long-term secondary medical complication in persons with spinal cord injury. The majority of morbidity problems and the most frequent cause of death were sepsis associated with geni...

Clinical and functional outcome of proximal femoral nailing in unstable intertrochanteric fractures

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome of proximal femoral nailing in 40 patients who had attended our institution, Government medical college Kozhikode between January 2015 and Jan...

Prospective study on functional outcome and role of hybrid external fixators in complex tibial plateau fractures

Introduction: Tibial plateau fractures are common due to high energy injuries. The principles of treatment include respect for the soft tissues, restoring the congruity of the articular surface and reduction of the anato...

Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture functional and anatomical outcomes over a mean follow-up period of two years

Background: The aim of this paper was to report the functional and clinical results of subcutaneous Achilles tendon rupture repairs through two surgical plasty techniques, with a mean follow-up of 2 years. Patients and m...

A comparative study of functional outcomes of fractures treated with plating versus conservative for complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly

Introduction: Most proximal humerus fractures are minimally displaced, low energy osteoporotic fractures and are effectively treated with conservative treatment. But for those that have moderate to severe displacement, t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP555232
  • DOI 10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i1a.06
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Padmanabh Vora, Dr. Parth Thaker, Dr. Jeet Gandhi, Dr. Yash Gupta, Dr. Himanshu Panchal, Dr. Mukund Prabhakar (2019). Comparing results of Endoscopic microdiscectomy and conventional discectomy for lumbar disc disease: A short term study. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 5(1), 30-33. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-555232