Comparing the Anaesthetic and Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine in Paediatric Patients

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Introduction of S enantiomer of bupivacaine is a major breakthrough in the history of local anaesthesia as the pharmacodynamics of these drugs were favourable in reducing the occurrence of cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity and unintended motor blockade. Aim: To compare efficacy, postoperative analgesia and postoperative motor blockade of 0.25% levobupivacaine with 0.25% ropivacaine in caudal block for children, scheduled for lower abdominal and lowerlimb surgeries. Materials and Methods: 80 children, ASA I–II, 1-10 years, weighing between 5-30 kg, scheduled for elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were given single caudal injection of 1 mL/kg of either levobupivacaine or ropivacaine. Caudal block was given after general anaesthesia using sevoflurane as induction agent airway secured with laryngeal mask. Postoperative pain score was assessed using Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) scale in children less than 6 years and numerical scale for children more than 6 years. Motor recovery was assessed by modified Bromage scale. Results: Onset of analgesia, duration of analgesia, postoperative pain and motor blockade were comparable between the two groups, of 40 each. Analgesia time was within 5 minutes in both the groups. Duration of analgesia was 404.8±67.6 minutes for levobupivacaine and 413.5±44.4 minutes for ropivacaine, which was not significant statistically. Postoperative analgesia was same between the two groups. It took 120 minutes for complete postoperative motor recovery. The motor recovery between the two groups was statistically not significant at immediate postoperative period (p=0.111), at 60 minutes (p=0.692). Conclusion: We conclude that both 1 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.25% ropivacaine provide similar effect caudal anaesthesia and analgesia with motor blockade for 120 minutes.

Authors and Affiliations

Sai Tejashree Veeravaavaavalli, BV Sunil, TV Shenoy

Keywords

Related Articles

Pregnancy Outcome of Abnormal Nuchal Translucency: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Nuchal Translucency (NT) is the sonographic form of subcutaneous gathering of liquid behind the foetal neck in the first trimester of pregnancy. There is association of increased NT with chromosomal and non...

Efficacy of Amnitear vs. Conventional Method for Artificial Rupture of Membranes: A Prospective Study

ABSTRACT Introduction: Amnitear is a newer device which is to be worn over gloved index finger for doing artificial rupture of membranes. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of Amnitear in doing Artificial Rupture of Membrane...

Role of Magnetic Resonance Urethrography in Evaluation of Male Urethral Stricture Against Conventional Retrograde Urethrography

ABSTRACT Introduction: Magnetic Resonance Urethrography (MRU) is a new and less widely used technique in the evaluation of male urethral strictures. Aim: This study intends to establish the role of MRU in the evaluation...

MRI findings of Persistent Mullerian Duct Syndrome: A Rare Case Report

Embryologically mullerian duct derivatives lead to formation of female genitalia and wolffian duct derivatives to male genitalia. Presence of mullerian duct derivatives in a chromosomally normal male (XY) leads to male p...

Rehabilitation of a Hemimandibulectomy Patient with an Overlay Denture: A Case Report

ABSTRACT Prosthetic rehabilitation of hemimandibulectomy patient, with an overlay denture, restores missing skeletal, dental structures, muscle imbalance, maxillomandibular relationship and occlusion. Conventional manage...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP525840
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34700.11652
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sai Tejashree Veeravaavaavalli, BV Sunil, TV Shenoy (2018). Comparing the Anaesthetic and Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine in Paediatric Patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(6), 5-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-525840