Comparision of Healing Period after Frenectomy Using Scalpel, Electrocautery & Diode Laser

Journal Title: Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research - Year 2017, Vol 21, Issue 12

Abstract

Background: An Aberrant frenum encroaches the gingival health when it is attached too closely to the gingival margin, either due to interference in the plaque control or due to a muscle pull. Such condition has to be treated by frenectomy which can be performed by scalpel, electrocautery, or with soft tissue lasers. Hence, the aim of the study is to compare the degree of healing of patients after frenectomy procedure with surgical scalpel, electrocautery and diode laser technique. Study Design: Original research article. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Periodontics at Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College & hospital at Visnagar, between July 2015 and august 2016. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 subjects ranging from 16 to 40 years of age group with papillary or papillary penetrating frenal attachment in the maxillary anterior region were selected. Enrolled subjects were randomly divided into three groups as follows Group A (n = 5): Comprised of 5 subjects selected for conventional scalpel technique. Group B (n = 5): comprised of 5 subjects selected for electrocautery technique. Group C (n = 5): comprised of 5 subjects selected for diode laser technique. Various parameters such as bleeding, pain, and swelling, presence of infection, wound healing and patient comfort were evaluated. Results: The results indicated patients treated with the diode laser had less postoperative pain (P < 0.0001) and required fewer analgesics (P < 0.001) as compared to patients treated with the conventional scalpel & electrocautery technique. Wound healing at 7th day and after 1 month for all the groups showed statistical significant difference with better outcome in Group C. However, wound healing at the end of 3 months did not show any significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: Based on current findings and clinical outcome, diode lasers provide better patient perception and an efficient and satisfactory option for procedures such as frenectomy.

Authors and Affiliations

Deepa Gandhi, Pratik Gandhi

Keywords

Related Articles

Half of Three Oral Antidiabetic Drugs as a Regimen for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Low-income Populations

There is a progressive increase in the number of patients developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), worldwide. Several classes of antidiabetic drugs are available. Metformin is a biguanide with many pleiotropic effects...

Vitamin D and Primary Immunodeficiencies

Some of the recognized actions of vitamin D include immunological effects such as keeping tolerance and to promote protective immunity. These functions are related to the blocking of B cell differentiation and immunoglob...

Lytic Infusion versus Bolus Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Thrombosis Management: The LIBRA Pilot Study

Objective: To compare two intra-arterial catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) techniques (bolus vs infusion) with respect to clinical outcomes and resource utilization in the management of peripheral arterial thrombosis....

Outcome and Congenital Anomalies in Children Born after Assisted Reproductive Technology in Port Harcourt

Aim: To evaluate the outcome of children born following Assisted Reproductive Technology in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Study Design: A retrospective study. Place of Study: Department of Paediatrics, University of Port Harco...

Oxidative Stress and Arsenic Exposure among Copper Smelters

Copper is widely used in industry. It has been associated with several health hazards among exposed workers. Aim: to measure the indicators of oxidative stress as malondialdehyde level and superoxide dismutase enzyme act...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP311839
  • DOI 10.9734/BJMMR/2017/32876
  • Views 53
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Deepa Gandhi, Pratik Gandhi (2017). Comparision of Healing Period after Frenectomy Using Scalpel, Electrocautery & Diode Laser. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 21(12), 1-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-311839