Comparision of spinal Anaesthesia vs General Anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A Randomized study

Journal Title: International Journal of Medical and Health Research - Year 2019, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: laparoscopic surgical techniques have been rapidly accepted by surgeons worldwide with published reports describing the benefits of less post-operative pain, decreased hospital stay and earlier return to work. Aims and Objectives: The study was planned to assess comparative superiority of spinal anaesthesia with general anaesthesia for elective laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in healthy patients. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in the department of anaesthesia, H.N.B. Base Teaching Hospital Srinagar Garhwal Uttarakhand, in which a total of 60 patients aged between 20-60 years of either sex with ASA Grade status I and II undergoing elective laparoscopic Cholecystectomy were selected. After taking consent from the ethical committee, they were divided into two groups Group A (n=30) received General Anaesthesia. Group B (n=30) received spinal Anaesthesia. Study Design: A randomized study. Exclusion Criteria: The patients with ASA grade III and IV high risk patients, all emergency procedures, bleeding disorders, acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis and acute cholangitis, previous open surgery in upper abdomen, contraindication for pneumoperitoneum, cardiovascular disorders, respiratory disorders, renal disease and liver disease, circulatory instability, and patients with known sensitivity to local anesthetics. Results: All the procedures were completed by the allocated method of anesthesia, as there were no conversions from spinal to general anesthesia. Pain was significantly less at 4 hours (P<0.0001), 8 hours (P<0.0001), 12 hours (P<0.0001), and 24 hours (P=0.0001) after the procedure for the spinal anesthesia group, compared with those who received general anesthesia. There was no difference between the two groups regarding complications, hospital stay, recovery, or degree of satisfaction at follow-up. Conclusion: In our study we observed that in comparision to general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia provides better safety and adequacy in healthy patients and hence provides better post-operative pain control without limiting the recovery. Post-operative complications like nausea, vomiting, dizziness and pneumonia are less in spinal anaesthesia.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Sanjul Dandona, Dr. CMS Rawat

Keywords

Related Articles

Observation on effect of combination drug regimens and (Snoup) single dose nevirapine prophylaxis regiment on prevention of perinatal transmission of HIV transmission (In the period from May 2012 to December 2016)

ART (Antiretroviral Therapy during pregnancy) is focused on the reduction of perinatal transmission and the treatment of maternal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. ART can reduce perinatal transmission by sever...

Antibiogram in tertiary care centre

A total 100 samples of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (C.S.O.M.) were studied bacteriologically. Ear infection was found to be more common in paediatric population (70.96%). Males suffered more than femal...

Study of thyroid diseases in Pediatrics patients

Most of the studies to date on thyroid hormone profile in critically ill patients and its correlation with outcome of patient are mainly conducted in surgical ICUs especially in adults. Very few studies are conducted in...

Methotrexate induced neurotoxicity: A stroke mimic

High Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia is one of the most common childhood malignancy, which is treated with high dose of intra thecal methotrexate. The drug has a poor oral bioavailability but has the ability to cross the bl...

Assessment of prescription pattern and quality of life in patients with epilepsy: A tertiary care hospital based prospective study

Background and objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the pattern of antiepileptic drugs(AEDs) used and to assess the impact of demographic data (according to age and gender) on quality of life (QOL) of the epil...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP581839
  • DOI -
  • Views 148
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Sanjul Dandona, Dr. CMS Rawat (2019). Comparision of spinal Anaesthesia vs General Anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A Randomized study. International Journal of Medical and Health Research, 5(1), 72-75. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-581839