COMPARISON BETWEEN RIPASA AND ALVARADO SCORING IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE APPENDICITIS

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 11

Abstract

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis is one of the most common cause of acute abdominal pain and emergency appendicectomy is the most common emergency surgery. The diagnosis of appendicitis is confirmed by histopathological examination that is not possible before appendicectomy. The negative exploration remains high in the rate of about 15-30%. 1 Scoring systems based on history, clinical examination and basic investigations are there in aiding the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and decreasing negative exploration. This study compares RIPASA and ALVARADO scoring systems in diagnosing acute appendicitis.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS A comparative study was done between November 2014 to June 2015. Patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis in Department of General Surgery, Government Royapettah Hospital. 100 of them are to be selected on the basis of nonprobability (purposive) sampling method. After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 96 were enrolled into the study. A full history, clinical examination and both scoring systems were done on the patients. RESULTS In 96 patients, 46 patients (48%) were male and 50 patients (52%) were female. 65 patients underwent emergency appendicectomy based on the clinical decision. The sensitivity and specificity of the RIPASA scoring system was 98.0% and 80.43%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the ALVARADO scoring system was 80.43% and 86.95%, respectively. The PPV (positive predictive value) of RIPASA and ALVARADO was 84% and 85%, respectively. The NPP (negative predictive value) of RIPASA and ALVARADO was 97% and 71%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 89% for RIPASA and 77% for ALVARADO. CONCLUSION The RIPASA scoring is better than ALVARADO scoring in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors and Affiliations

Balakrishnan Subramani, Lokeshwari Kalaichelvan, Ganganesamy Selvam, Latha Madhavan

Keywords

Related Articles

A STUDY OF CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS IN YELLOW OLEANDER SEED POISONING- AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

BACKGROUND Yellow oleander seed poisoning causes a wide variety of rhythm disturbances, electrocardiographic variations and abnormalities. some of them primarily due to cardio active glycosides and some are secondary to...

ASSESSING OUTCOME OF ANTENATAL HYDRONEPHROSIS- AN INTEGRATED CLINICAL APPROACH

BACKGROUND The widespread use of ultrasonography during pregnancy has resulted in a higher detection rate of congenital malformations. Out of these antenatally detected congenital malformations Antenatal Hydronephrosis (...

RARE CASE OF TEXTILOMA OF NOSE PRESENTING WITH FAILURE OF EXTERNAL DCR AND NASAL OBSTRUCTION

It’s not uncommon to have complications for a surgical procedure even after taking meticulous care about do’s and don’ts. Retained foreign objects (RFO) are one of the underreported complications for obvious reasons of l...

AN OBSERVATIVE STUDY OF COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY BETWEEN LOSARTAN AND COMBINATION OF LOSARTAN AND AMLODIPINE IN THE MAINTENANCE THERAPY OF HYPERTENSION IN OPD OF GENERAL MEDICINE DEPARTMENT AT GIMS, KALABURAGI

BACKGROUND Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of hypertension increases with advancing age. The beta receptor antagonists provide effective therapy for all grades of hypertension. Comp...

VIRAL FEVER WITH THROMBOCYTOPENIA

BACKGROUND There is an alarming increase in the incidence of fever with thrombocytopenia especially during monsoon and peri-monsoon period. Infections with protozoa, bacteria and viruses can cause thrombocytopenia with o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP214007
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2017/121
  • Views 106
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Balakrishnan Subramani, Lokeshwari Kalaichelvan, Ganganesamy Selvam, Latha Madhavan (2017). COMPARISON BETWEEN RIPASA AND ALVARADO SCORING IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE APPENDICITIS. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 4(11), 624-627. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-214007