Comparison of Accuracy of Bracket Placement by Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques using Digital Processing - An In-Vitro Study

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Accuracy of bracket positioning is an essential part of successful orthodontic treatment. Ideally placed brackets help in treatment mechanics and improve consistency of the result. The current study compares the accuracy of bracket placement using direct and indirect bonding. Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of bracket placement by Direct and Indirect Bonding techniques using digitally captured and processed images. Materials and Methods: Brackets were bonded on thirteen sets of duplicated orthodontic models, six sets each for Direct and Indirect bonding and one set as predetermined “ideal” bonding. Ideal bonding was achieved through repeated revision of bonding till it was found to be ideal by a group of five experienced orthodontists. This is a standard procedure followed by historic studies for achieving ideal bonding. Accuracy of the bracket placement through direct and indirect method was compared against ideal bonding on three dimensions – bracket height, mesiodistal position and angulation. Digital processing was used to compare the twelve sets against the ideal bracket positioning. A student’s t-test was used to determine whether statistically significant differences existed among ideal and experimental groups. Results: Overall, the difference in accuracy in bracket placement between Direct and Indirect bonding was statistically insignificant. Indirect bonding yielded more accurate results on selected teeth (p≤0.05)- Bracket height on 34, mesiodistal position on 13 and 34 and angular placement on 44 and 14. Coefficient of variation for direct bonding was 0.855, 0.750, and 0.719 for bracket height, angulation and mesiodistal position respectively. Corresponding values for indirect bonding were 0.853, 0.799 and 0.445 respectively. Conclusion: Neither technique yielded ideal bracket placement. Overall, Indirect bonding was better in terms of accuracy more often (70% for vertical & 60% for horizontal positioning), but the difference was statistically insignificant indicating high variability. Hence, the advantage wasn’t consistent.

Authors and Affiliations

Ravneet K Kalra, Sanjay Mittal, Chandrashekhar Gandikota, Vikas Sehgal, Rajiv Gupta, Zarina Bali

Keywords

Related Articles

Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine Sedation in the Attenuation of Surgical Stress Response and Postoperative Pain: A Retrospective Study

ABSTRACT Introduction: Surgical procedures cause stress response in the body. This response involves endocrine, metabolic, haematologic and immunologic reactions. Ketamine has an anti-proinflammatory effect as limiting e...

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Biodentine, Resin Modified GIC and Hybrid Composite Resin as a Core Material

Introduction: The restoration of a severely damaged tooth usually needs a post and core as a part of treatment procedure to provide a corono - radicular stabilization. Biodentine is a class of dental material which posse...

Successful Orthodontic and Periodontic Management of Impacted Central Incisor with Compromised Labial Bone

ABSTRACT Normal eruption of teeth is considered a critical phase for the development of hard and soft tissue apparatus of the craniofacial system. Disturbance in tooth eruption, in general, may lead to delay of eruption...

Socket Preservation using Platelet Rich Fibrin for Pink Aesthetics- A Case Report

ABSTRACT Post extraction preservation of interdental papillae, poses a challenge to the clinicians exclusively when related to the restoration of missing anterior teeth. In the modern era, patients claim for aesthetics,...

Association between Serum Visfatin, Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Metabolic Syndrome in Obese Premenopausal Women

ABSTRACT Introduction: Visfatin is an adipokine secreted by visceral fat tissue that has important effects on normal insulin secretion. An association has been found between visfatin and cardiovascular risk factors and o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP524683
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2018/32466.11975
  • Views 109
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ravneet K Kalra, Sanjay Mittal, Chandrashekhar Gandikota, Vikas Sehgal, Rajiv Gupta, Zarina Bali (2018). Comparison of Accuracy of Bracket Placement by Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques using Digital Processing - An In-Vitro Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(9), 7-11. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-524683