Comparison of Adnexal Mass in Women Undergoing Mass Excision During the Antepartum Period and Cesarean Section

Journal Title: Oman Medical Journal - Year 2016, Vol 31, Issue 3

Abstract

Objectives: The frequency of adnexal masses in pregnant women ranges from 0.1% to 4%. Selecting the right approach to manage the subsequent intervention remains one of the most controversial challenges among gynecologists. Our aim in this cross-sectional study was to clarify the clinical-pathological differences among the adnexal masses that are excised during either the antepartum period or cesarean section (CS). Methods: In this study, we assessed 11,000 pregnancy cases referred to the Qaem Hospital in the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran, between 2010 and 2014. In total, 53 pregnant women with adnexal masses (other than non-gynecological mass and ectopic pregnancy) were selected for further investigation. We divided patients into two groups (group A and group B). Patients of group A had a diagnosed tumor that was excised antepartum while patients in group B had a mass taken out during CS. We then assembled data based on maternal age, parity, gestational age, surgery type, delivery mode, size and location of the tumor, complications, presentations, histopathological diagnosis, and ultrasonography findings for further analysis. Results: The major proportion of masses (62.3%) were excised during CS whereas the remainder (37.7%) were removed antepartum. The mean size of the detected tumor for benign and malignant cases was 10.0 cm and 13.8 cm in group A, and 8.0 cm and 9.3 cm in group B, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference observed between patients in the two groups regarding the benign/malignant status of the mass (p = 0.008), its size (p = 0.019) and simplicity/complexity (p = 0.004). Conclusions: The rate of malignant tumors was considerably higher in women who had antepartum mass excision compared to those with mass resection during CS. Also, tumors were larger (and more complex) in patients in group A compared to group B.

Authors and Affiliations

Nafiseh Saghafi, Zohreh Yousefi Roodsary, Sima Kadkhodaeian, Maliheh Hasanzadeh Mofrad, Elham Hosseini Farahabadi, Mohammadreza Hoseinyfarahabady

Keywords

Related Articles

Sea Urchin Granuloma of the Hands: A Case Report

Penetrating wounds from sea urchin spines are marine injuries that may cause morbidity in humans. Seasonal fishing for abalone in Dhofar is associated with an increase in the number of these injuries, as divers may strik...

What Could This Thoracic Mass Be?

A 33-year-old gravida III (para 1, abortion 1, living 1) woman with poor antenatal care delivered a male infant by spontaneous vaginal delivery. The newborn had a live, beating heart protruding through an anterior chest...

Tenofovir-induced Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis

Tenofovir, a nucleotide analog, is one of the first-line medications recommended for the treatment of active chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHB) and as a primary prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B reactivation in c...

Radiology Quiz: Right Thoracic Cavity Mass

A 40-year-old Omani male presented with a history of recurrent mild dyspnea and chest discomfort of long duration. This was associated with occasional heaviness in the right thoracic region. He had no associated fever or...

Neonatal Stridor in Familial Congenital Laryngeal Paralysis (Plott Syndrome): A Case Study in an Omani Family

Stridor presenting soon after birth due to bilateral abductor vocal cord paralysis (VCP) is rare. We report a family with bilateral VCP affecting four male members in two generations and hence suggesting X-linked recessi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP101469
  • DOI 10.5001/omj.2016.41
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nafiseh Saghafi, Zohreh Yousefi Roodsary, Sima Kadkhodaeian, Maliheh Hasanzadeh Mofrad, Elham Hosseini Farahabadi, Mohammadreza Hoseinyfarahabady (2016). Comparison of Adnexal Mass in Women Undergoing Mass Excision During the Antepartum Period and Cesarean Section. Oman Medical Journal, 31(3), 217-222. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-101469