Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development

Journal Title: Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 4

Abstract

Background: Clean air action plans have been prepared and are still being implemented in Turkey to control and prevent air pollution, and improve the air quality. The plans reveal a picture of the current situation and available inventory information. However, in order to implement the identified plans in real life, they need to be prioritized. This study aimed to identify and prioritize clean air action plans for Turkey using a framework of both fuzzy and crisp evaluations. Methods: In this study, priorities of the plans were identified and analyzed with a decision-making model. A three-step research methodology was provided. First, literature was reviewed regarding sustainable development and action plans. Second, in order to narrow and specify action plans, the nominal group technique (NGT) was implemented. Finally, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and best-worst method (BWM) surveys were applied to environmental engineers and experts working on sustainable development to prioritize the action plans. Results: It was revealed that heating dimension is considered as the most important criterion with the weight of 0.7469 in fuzzy AHP and 0.758 in BWM. AP1 with a weight of 0.3356 in fuzzy AHP and AP3 with a weight of 0.3289 in BWM were the most important sub-criteria, which are the plans for reducing coal use ranked at the forefront in reducing air pollution. Conclusion: According to the results, there is no significant difference in the priority ranking results. The results of fuzzy AHP and BWM are very similar. For example, traffic criterion has the best performance in both methods in the evaluation of decision makers. In addition, the main and sub-criteria with the lowest priority are the same in these two methods.

Authors and Affiliations

Ahmet Çalık

Keywords

Related Articles

Application of imputation methods for missing values of PM10 and O3 data: Interpolation, moving average and K-nearest neighbor methods

Background: PIn air quality studies, it is very often to have missing data due to reasons such as machine failure or human error. The approach used in dealing with such missing data can affect the results of the analys...

Simultaneous adsorption of heavy metals from aqueous matrices by nanocomposites: A first systematic review of the evidence

Background: Nanocomposites have received remarkable attention as effective adsorbents for removal of coexisting pollutants over the last decades. The presence of heavy metals (HMs) in wastewater has caused a global healt...

Detection of Helicobacter pylori genes (CagA and VacA) in municipal drinking water

Background: Helicobacter pylori is classified as a carcinogen, and it is also the most common cause of chronic bacterial infection and peptic ulcers. Approximately 45% of people are infected with the bacterium. Method...

The risk of gastrointestinal cancer and nitrate intake due to vegetable consumption: A case-control study in Minab, Iran

Background: Nitrate (NO3) is a necessary element for plant growth, but its excessive use in agricultural products causes different health problems. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between NO3 concentra...

Defluoridation potential of indigenous thirst-quenching herbal products commonly used in Kerala, India

Background: Drinking fluoride-contaminated water is a severe health hazard problem. Fluorosis -both skeletal and dental- is an important clinical and public health problem in about 24 countries including India. The bes...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP676160
  • DOI 10.15171/EHEM.2019.29
  • Views 266
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ahmet Çalık (2019). Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 6(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-676160