Comparison of epidural technique with combined spinal epidural technique for labor analgesia

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: For pain relief during labor, regional analgesia is considered the most preferred technique; nevertheless the best method is yet to be determined. We carried out a randomized study to assess efficacy, safety & maternal satisfaction with standard epidural and combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia technique among 40 primigarvida. Materials and Methods: Healthy primigarvida in labor having cervical dilatation between 3 to 5 cm were assigned randomly to receive either epidural or CSE for labor analgesia. Analgesia was established in Epidural group with 12ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine added with 2µg/ml fentanyl & in CSE group with intrathecal injection of 2.5mg 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus fentanyl 25µg (total 2 ml). In both groups whenever patient’s VAS>3, 2nd dose was given in form of epidural bolus 10ml 0.0625% bupivacaine + 2µg/ml fentanyl, followed by infusion of same concentration at 8 ml/h. Results: The onset of labor analgesia was significantly faster in CSE group (5.5±1.9 vs. 13±5.9 minutes, p<0.001) compared to epidural group. More than 75% patients in both groups didn’t developed any motor blockade. The total dose of bupivacaine used in Epidural group was 20.5±6.6mg whereas it was only 8.5±7.7mg in CSE group which was significant low than epidural group; same was for fentanyl (65.1±21.6µg in epidural and 44.4±24.6µg in CSE group). In CSE group 35% patients had pruritus and 10% had nausea and vomiting, but none had in epidural group. Mothers have labeled quality of analgesia comparable. Conclusions: Both techniques were equally effective in relieving the pain during labor, but the onset of analgesia with CSE technique was faster than epidural group. The LSCS rate was comparable and complications were minor. Thus CSE can be safe and effective alternative to standard epidural technique for labor analgesia.

Authors and Affiliations

Dhaval Kumar C. Patel, Neeta Abhay Kavishvar

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative study of bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine and only bupivacaine during brachial plexus block

Introduction: Regional anaesthesia techniques are very successful in alleviating pain during and after various surgical procedures. During upper extremity surgery Supraclavicular Brachial plexus block is commonly adminis...

Intra operative temporomandibular joint dislocation during use of proseal LMA

General anaesthesia is associated with several common complications TMJ dislocation is one of the rare complications encountered during airway management Usually occurs during endotracheal intubation but other factors su...

Effect of education level and previous anaesthesia exposure on knowledge and perception about anaesthesia and anaesthesiologist: A questionnaire based observational study

Introduction and Aim: Anaesthesia as speciality has evolved very much but the services are yet very much under recognized. This may be partly because of low knowledge of anaesthesia and anaesthesiologists. School educati...

Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy: Case series report

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy, a rare clinical entity demands early diagnosis, immediate delivery of fetus, systematic approach for correction of coagulopathy, renal injury & sepsis along with hemodynamic and ventilator...

Role of Dexmedetomidine in anesthetic management of lower limb orthopaedic surgery in a patient with low ejection fraction

Cardiac patient for non cardiac surgery has since forever been a topic of interest for the anaesthesiologist Few cases have only been reported with their own suitable line of management however the simultaneous use of co...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP473002
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0022
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dhaval Kumar C. Patel, Neeta Abhay Kavishvar (2018). Comparison of epidural technique with combined spinal epidural technique for labor analgesia. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 5(1), 129-133. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-473002