Comparison of Friedewald’s Formula and Martin’s Method with Direct Assay of Serum LDL-Cholesterol

Journal Title: Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract: Serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) dictate not only diagnosis but also risk classification and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Owing to the cost-effectiveness, Friedewald formula (FF) is primarily preferred and adopted method to assess serum LDL-C levels especially when triglycerides (TG) <400 mg/dL. FF employs a fixed factor of 5 for the ratio of TG to very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG:VLDL-C). Martin et. al., in their recent study proposed an adjustable factor using N-strata-specific median TG:VLDL-C ratios. They constructed 180-cell table based on non-High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and TG levels. In the present cross-sectional study, the performance of LDL-C measurements based on FF (LDL-CF) and novel method (LDL-CN) in comparison to direct homogenous assay (LDL-CD) was evaluated. A total of 480 lipid profile data with serum TG <400 mg/dL were procured. The efficacy of both LDL-CF and LDL-CN measurements were evaluated under broader as well as in constricted ranges of TG. The entire lipid profile data was pooled under Group I comprising broader range of TG i.e., TG <400 mg/dL. The data of Group I were further stratified into subsequent three groups with constricted range of TG. Hence, Group II (TG<100 mg/dL), Group III (TG=100-199 mg/dL), Group IV (TG=200-399 mg/dL) comprised 153, 170 and 147 samples, respectively. Bland-Altman (B&A) and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC, ρc) analysis were used as statistical tools. Difference plot of B&A analysis indicated narrow 95% limits of agreement (LOA) as bias±2 standard deviations with low percentage error for LDL-CN in contrast to LDL-CF at all ranges of TG. Although both formula based methods were in substantial strength-of-agreement with LDL-CD yet LDL-CN expressed marginally higher ρc (95%CI) with precision and accuracy in all Groups. Hence, in corroboration with earlier studies, our study also further supports the efficacy of LDL-CN in comparison to LDL-CF.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. MVP Chowdary, B Sangeetha . , A Suganya

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of two point discrimination threshold on the thumbs of healthy adult Nigerians

Two-point discrimination threshold test is a widely employed method of evaluating tactile acuity. It is valuable for assessing injuries to nerves supplying the hands and outcome of surgical manipulations. Availability of...

Cytomorphology of Thyroid Lesions in a Sub Himalayan Tertiary Hospital after More Than Two Decades of Iodization

Abstract: Thyroid disorders are one of the commonest endocrinal disorders in the general population. They present with palpable swelling/nodule or may be non-palpable. In the Himalayan goitre belt it is been more than tw...

Escitalopram Induced Bruxism: A Case Report

Abstract: The report describes a patient suffering from somatoform disorder, who developed bruxism on treatment with escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). During the initial stages of the thera...

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotyping and its Clinical Utility for Disease Monitoring

The hepatotropic viruses are a major public health problem representing the most common cause of liver disease worldwide. The distribution of HCV genotypes vary according to the geographical region. Genotypes 1-3 are wid...

C T and Clinical Correlation of Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Abstract: The cases of acute pancreatitis is more common now a days. Our ED admits cases of Acute Pancreatitis on almost on all days. Here we try to analyse the effectiveness of CT in diagnosis and grading of disease. So...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP475466
  • DOI -
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. MVP Chowdary, B Sangeetha . , A Suganya (2018). Comparison of Friedewald’s Formula and Martin’s Method with Direct Assay of Serum LDL-Cholesterol. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 6(3), 951-959. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-475466