COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH NON-CONTACT TONOMETRY AND APPLANATION TONOMETRY AMONG VARIOUS CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS GROUPS

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. Intraocular Pressure (IOP) is the only known modifiable risk factor that has been shown to delay progression in both ocular hypertension and glaucoma patients. Clinical measurement of IOP has undergone several technical advances from the initial digital tension measurements, through indentation tonometry, to applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry. This study was done to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with Non Contact Tonometry (NCT) and Goldmann Applanation tonometry (GAT) and to compare NCT IOP and GAT IOP among various central corneal thickness (CCT) groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS IOP measurements were done by NCT and then by GAT followed by CCT. All IOP readings were taken in the sitting position over fifteen minutes. NCT was performed before the GAT to avoid the known mild reduction of IOP by anterior chamber compression with GAT. RESULTS The study included 200 eyes of 100 patients. Mean age of the patients was 58.14 ± 11.7 years (range 35- 81 years). The study population consisted of 58 males and 42 females. The mean ± SD intraocular pressure measurements were 23.39 ± 4.6 mmHg and 22.41 ± 5.9 mmHg for NCT and GAT, respectively. The difference between the NCT and GAT IOP was 0.98 ± 4.7 mm Hg. Mean CCT of the study group was 545.74 ± 38.23 microns. The IOP measured with both GAT and NCT showed no significant change with increasing CCT. The difference between the means increases with increasing CCT upto 600 microns. At lower IOPs ≤ 20 mm Hg, GAT measures are higher than NCT and this relationship is reversed at high IOPs. CONCLUSION Intraocular pressure measurement by NCT was consistently higher than GAT. There was a tendency for NCT to underestimate IOP at lower ranges and overestimates IOP at higher ranges. By applying appropriate correction factor for CCT, Noncontact tonometry could be used as a good screening tool for glaucoma evaluation.

Authors and Affiliations

Radhakrishnan B, Hemapriya S, Nazeem Farzana Ghouse, Aparna Rajagopalan

Keywords

Related Articles

TACROLIMUS OINTMENT FOR TREATMENT OF VKC

BACKGROUND Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a bilateral recurrent chronic allergy inflammatory disorder of ocular surface, which is seasonally exacerbated mostly involving tarsal and bulbar conjunctiva in chronic and...

STUDY OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN SNAKE BITE PATIENTS

BACKGROUND Snake venom is well known to cause toxic damage to the kidneys (Schreiner and Maher, 1965). This study is an attempt to evaluate the snakebite-induced Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). MATERIALS AND METHODS 50 patien...

A STUDY OF MUCOCUTANEOUS MANIFESTATIONS IN AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISORDERS AT TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

BACKGROUND Our aim was to study the clinical and immunological profile of patients with newly detected connective tissue disease presented to a tertiary care centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study involved 51 patients w...

A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF DEPRESSION IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS

Depressive disorders in adolescents are a major cause of concern. As these disorders are subject to high recurrences in adulthood. The risk factors have to be identified and prompt treatment should be initiated. 15% have...

CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE HEART BLOCK

BACKGROUND The angiographic findings and prognosis of patients with Complete Heart Block (CHB) remain unclear. Thus, we aimed to study the clinical profile, risk factors, angiographic distribution and in-hospital outcome...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP454129
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2018/108
  • Views 54
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Radhakrishnan B, Hemapriya S, Nazeem Farzana Ghouse, Aparna Rajagopalan (2018). COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH NON-CONTACT TONOMETRY AND APPLANATION TONOMETRY AMONG VARIOUS CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS GROUPS. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 5(6), 531-536. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-454129