Comparison of Low Dose Fentanyl with Low Dose Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to 0.5% Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Block via Multipoint Injection Technique under Sonographic Guidance

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 4

Abstract

Background: To see effect of low dose fentanyl vs low dose dexamethasone in ultrasound guided supraclavicular block via multipoint injection technique. Methods: This double blinded randomized controlled study was carried out on 60 patients belonging to ASA grade I and II, undergoing surgeries of the upper limb under USG guided supraclavicular block via multipoint injection technique. Group I (NS) received 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 1 ml normal saline. Group II (Fenta) received 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 10 µg (1 ml) fentanyl. Group III (Dexa) received 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 4 mg (1 ml) dexamethasone. Results: The onset of sensory blockade in group 1 (NS) was 9.6430 ± 1.19025 min, in group 2 (Fenta) it was 10.3395 ± 0.59338 min, whereas in group 3 (Dexa) it was 3.9735 ± 0.41802 min. The onset of motor blockade was 17.9025 ± 1.13816 min in group 1 (NS), 17.9530 ± 0.85577 min in group 2 (Fenta), 8.6145 ± 1.15154 min in group 3 (Dexa). The mean duration of sensory blockade in group 1 (NS) was 259.200 ± 36.3544 min, in group 2 (Fenta) it was 406.350 ± 20.1240 min, whereas in group 3 (Dexa) it was 1031.500 ± 173.8676 min. The mean duration of motor block in minutes was 197.900 ± 31.8878 in group 1 (NS), 339.250 ± 26.2616 in group 2 (Fenta) and 934.950 ± 168.9181 min in group 3 (Dexa). Conclusion: The dosage of fentanyl and dexamethasone do not linearly correlate to the degree of blockade. Dexamethasone is superior to fentanyl as an adjuvant in supraclavicular block.

Authors and Affiliations

Kunaal Kumar Sharma

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of 0.5% Bupivacaine with 0.5% Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone in Peribulbar Block for Small Incision Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Objective: To compare the anesthetic efficacy and postoperative analgesia between 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mg dexamethasone and 0.5% bupivacaine alone in peribular block for small incision cataract surgery. Methods: 50 pati...

A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Study on Postoperative Pain Relief in Lower Orthopedic Surgeries-Comparison between Intravenous Inj. Nalbuphine, Inj. Tramadol and Inj. Ketorolac

Introduction: Effective post surgical pain management is essential for the recovery and rehabilitation process. Intravenous injection brings more rapid pain relief than other methods.In this study, We had compared Inj. N...

Effect of Etomidate and Propofol on the Onset of Neuromuscular Blockade a Randomized Prospective Comparative Study

The onset time of neuromuscular blockade can be influenced by factors such as hypnotics which interfere with muscle blood flow and muscle relaxation induced by nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers. Aim: This study was...

Comparative Clinical Study of 0.5% Lignocaine Alone and Combination of 0.25% Lignocaine Withpentazocine and Pancuronium In Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia for Upper Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries

Background and Objective: Intravenous regional anaesthesia with conventional large dose of local anaestheticis associated with serious systemic toxicity when the tourniquet deflates unexpectedly during the procedure or w...

Comparision of Direct vs Indirect Laryngoscopic View by C-Mac Videolaryngoscope

Introduction: Previous studies have hypothesized that in routine patients undergoing surgery, the conventional C-MAC video laryngoscope compared to direct laryngoscopy can improve the rate of glottis view significantly....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP668070
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6419.42
  • Views 104
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kunaal Kumar Sharma (2019). Comparison of Low Dose Fentanyl with Low Dose Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to 0.5% Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Block via Multipoint Injection Technique under Sonographic Guidance. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 6(4), 1361-1366. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-668070