Comparison of Mannitol, Hypertonic Saline and Mannitol + Hypertonic Saline Combination for Brain Relaxation during Craniotomy

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 10

Abstract

Background: Hyperosmolar solutions are most commonly used to relax brain and facilitate intracranial surgery. This study was planned to compare the effects of three equiosmolar, equivolemic solutions (mannitol, 3% hypertonic saline, and mannitol+3% hypertonic saline) on intraoperative brain relaxation. Material and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted in 90 patients of age group 18­65 years with traumatic brain injury undergoing craniotomy only after approval from the institutional ethics committee. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups; Group M ( received mannitol 300 ml), GROUP S (Group received 3% Hypertonic Saline 300 ml), and GROUP M+S (received mannitol 150 ml and 3% Hypertonic Saline 150 ml). Brain relaxation score was assessed by neurosurgeon on a four point scale as perfectly relaxed­1, satisfactorily relaxed­2, firm brain­3, bulging brain­4. All the patients were assessed for Glasgow coma score at 24 hrs postoperatively and at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit. Results: Grade 1 and Grade 2 brain relaxation scores were 4/14, 4/16 and 8/12 in Group M, Group S and Group M+S respectively. (p>0.05) Total urine out was 1453.33±376.68 ml in group M, 823.33±238.43 ml in group S and 1313.33±156.96 ml in group M+S respectively. (p<0.001) There was non­significant rise and fall of electrolyte (Na+ and K+) level amongst the groups. Additional rescue dose of mannitol was required in all three groups in 12, 8 and 10 patients respectively. Conclusion: All three hyperosmolar solutions are equally effective in providing adequate intraoperative brain relaxation during decompressive craniotomy in traumatic brain injury.

Authors and Affiliations

Neelesh Bhatnagar

Keywords

Related Articles

Efficacy of Epidural 0.75% Ropivacaine vs. Epidural 0.5% Bupivacaine for Adult Patients undergoing Major Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Double Blind Randomized Control Study

Context: In view of the wider application of regional anesthetic procedure in modern anaesthesia practice, there is a need for local anesthetic with desirable properties like longer duration of sensory blockade for post...

A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study on Tracheal Intubation using Airtraq versus McCoy Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients

Background: Airtraq and Mc Coy laryngoscopes have been commonly used in difficult airway scenarios. In the present study, the study aims to evaluate the comparison of Airtraq from McCoy Laryngoscope in view of laryngosco...

Comparative Study of Clinical Effects of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patients with Lower Limb Surgeries

Objective: In a prospective study, clinical effects of intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg with fentanyl 25µg versus 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg were compared in total 60 patients of ASA grade I and II un...

Comparitive Study of Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Bupivacaine for Epidural Labour Analgesia

Labour is an extremely painful process. Labour pain is of major concern since most parturients experience significant pain of extremely severe intensity. Labour pain can have deleterious effects on the mother, on the foe...

Comparative Study of Granisetron, Metoclopramide and Droperidol in Prevention of Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting

Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of intravenously administered Granisetron Metoclopramide and Droperidol in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP548509
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.51018.14
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Neelesh Bhatnagar (2018). Comparison of Mannitol, Hypertonic Saline and Mannitol + Hypertonic Saline Combination for Brain Relaxation during Craniotomy. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(10), 1673-1678. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-548509