Comparison of Modified Mallampati Test and Upper Lip Bite Test in Prediction of Difficult Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Study

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 8

Abstract

Introduction: Unanticipated difficult laryngoscopic tracheal intubation accounts for a significant proportion of adverse anaesthetic outcome in clinical practice. Hence, it is important to identify patients with difficult airway preoperatively. In our study, we have compared the upper lip bite test with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 150 ASA I patients of either sex, aged more than 18 years scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Pre-operatively airways of the patients were evaluated using modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test. MMT class III and class IV and ULBT class III were considered potentially difficult intubation. Experienced anaesthesiologists unaware of pre-operative airway evaluation, will perform laryngoscopy and grade the glottic view as per Cormack and Lehane’s classification. Grade III and IV were considered as difficult intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of ULBT and MMT were calculated. Results: MMT was more sensitive (71.43%) than ULBT (28.57%). MMT had a specificity of 81.82 as compared to 96.5% for ULBT. Positive predictive value for MMT is 16.3% and 28.57% for ULBT. Negative predictive value was 98.32% and 96.50% for MMT and ULBT respectively. Accuracy of MMT was 81.33% while it was 93.33% for ULBT. Conclusions: Modified Mallampati test is an inherently better test at predicting difficult endotracheal intubation when compared to upper lip bite test. Both modified Mallampati and upper lip bite test are better predictors of easy intubation rather than as positive predictors of difficult intubation.

Authors and Affiliations

Reshma Balakrishnan

Keywords

Related Articles

Incidence of Internal Jugular Vein Valve Incompetence through High versus Low Approach for IJV Cannulation

Studies done on internal jugular venous valve (IJVV) competence shows that structural and functional integrity of the IJV valve may be compromised when the IJV is cannulated for insertion of a central venous catheter. US...

A Comparative Study of Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine 0.5% Heavy for Lower Limb and Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Introduction: Opioids have been extensively used as an adjuvant because of excellent results in neuraxial blocks. Fentanyl is widely used but is found to have higher incidence of pruritus for which Nalbuphine was conside...

Effect of Dexmedetomidine Nebulization on Attenuation of Haemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy: Randomized Controlled Study

Introduction: Dexmedetomidine is a potent and highly selective alpha (2)-adrenoreceptor agonist. It has sympatholytic and antinociceptive effects which allow hemodynamic stability during stressful condition e.g. Laryngos...

Comparitive Study of Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Bupivacaine for Epidural Labour Analgesia

Labour is an extremely painful process. Labour pain is of major concern since most parturients experience significant pain of extremely severe intensity. Labour pain can have deleterious effects on the mother, on the foe...

Effect of Auto-Co-Induction of Propofol on Total Induction Dose and Haemodynamics

Rapid induction with propofol causes fall in arterial pressure and tachycardia.Our study aims at comparing the hemodynamic changes between rapid dose and priming dose, measure propofol requirement and evaluate complicati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP536504
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5818.19
  • Views 103
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Reshma Balakrishnan (2018). Comparison of Modified Mallampati Test and Upper Lip Bite Test in Prediction of Difficult Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Study. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(8), 1367-1371. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-536504