Comparison of predictive validity of Alvarado score and Lintula score in acute appendicitis in adults

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is still one of the most common emergency encountered in surgical practice at all levels of health care. In resource poor settings, where diagnostic facilities for definitive diagnosis are not available objective clinical scoring systems play an important role in diagnosis and therapeutic decision making Materials and Methods: To compare the predictive validity of Alvarado score and Lintula score in acute appendicitis in adults. The study was a prospective observational study conducted in the department of general surgery Dr. SMCSI Medical College, Karakonam. Trivandrum, between February to December 2016. A total of 130 subjects aged ≥1 year with symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis were included. Alvarado and Lintula scores were calculated for all subjects and were compared with histopathology findings. An Alvarado score of ≥7, Lintula score of ≥21 was considered as screening positive. Results: Alvarado score had a sensitivity of 63.15 % (52.31% to 74.00%), specificity of 81.48 % (71.12% to 91.84%). Positive predictive value & Negative predictive value was 82.75% (72.03% to 92.47%) and 61.11% (49.85% to 72.37%) respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 70.26% (62.95% to 78.58%). Lintula score had a sensitivity of 72.36 % (62.31% to 82.42%), specificity was 88.88 % (80.50% to 97.27%). Positive predictive value & Negative predictive value was 90.16% (82.69% to 97.63%) and 69.56% (58.70% to 80.42%) respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 79% (95%CI 72.25% to 86.20%). Conclusions: Lintula score is more accurate than Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors and Affiliations

Karpagavel Chandrabose, Velayudhan Nair

Keywords

Related Articles

A comparative study of surgical accesses to breast fibroadenoma

Introduction: A Breast lump is a major health concern amongst women.Increased awareness has resulted in patients seeking early surgical consultation. Surgical resection is traditionally done by Fibroadenoma excision thro...

Diagnostic laparoscopy in chronic abdominal diseases

Objectives: To establish an early diagnosis of the diseases where clinical findings are unreliable, with additional information about extent, nature, morbid changes and operability of the diseases andto establish that la...

Orthogonal dual plating for fracture of base of 1st metacarpal- original study

Background: Treatment of fractures of the base of 1st metacarpal is controversial with multimodality of implant choice available like k wire and miniplates. Secondary displacement rates are higher if fracture is not fixe...

A prospective study of radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma

Background: Gallbladder cancer tends to be an aggressive tumor that spreads early and leads to rapid death. The clinical pessimism surrounding gallbladder cancer is because of its late presentation and lack of effective...

Evaluation of Noncontract computed tomography in diagnosing acute appendicitis

Introduction: Appendicitis is a common disease, having a lifetime incidence of 7%. Surgeons have traditionally accepted negative appendectomy rate up to 20%. It is because of clinical myriad. Objectives of study were to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP264946
  • DOI 10.17511/ijoso.2017.i3.02
  • Views 176
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Karpagavel Chandrabose, Velayudhan Nair (2017). Comparison of predictive validity of Alvarado score and Lintula score in acute appendicitis in adults. Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics, 3(3), 60-65. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-264946