COMPARISON OF PREOPERATIVE TOPICAL NEPAFENAC (0.1%), FLURBIPROFEN (0.03%) AND KETOROLAC (0.4%) EYE DROPS IN MAINTAINING MYDRIASIS DURING PHACOEMULSIFICATION- A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 40

Abstract

BACKGROUND Phacoemulsification with IOL implantation is the current surgical treatment of choice for cataract extraction. Intraoperative manipulation during surgery triggers inflammatory cascade resulting in miosis, pain, inflammation or cystoid macular oedema. Adequate pupillary dilatation and its maintenance is required for proper anterior capsule incision and nucleus delivery and IOL implantation failing which may lead to complications. Aim- This study compares the effectiveness of prophylactic administration of topical flurbiprofen 0.03%, nepafenac 0.1% and ketorolac 0.4% in maintaining mydriasis during phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in the capsular bag. MATERIALS AND METHODS It is a prospective, randomised, double blind study involving 120 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification which were randomly and equally divided into four groups receiving topical nepafenac 0.1% (Group 1), flurbiprofen 0.03% (Group 2), ketorolac 0.4% (Group 3), placebo CMC 0.5% (Group 4) prior to the surgery. Pupil diameters were recorded at different stages of surgery and the mean value was compared. All the data was analysed with the software SPSS 20.0. Chi square test and ANOVA was used for comparison amongst the four groups. RESULTS Total 120 eyes were included, 50 females and 70 males of mean age 59.458 ± 8.74 years. The pupil diameter at the baseline was comparable in all four groups. Significant difference was seen in the pupil diameter in all the groups; however, nepafenac group had the least decrease in the pupil diameter at the end of surgery (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION Topical nepafenac has shown to be a potent inhibitor of miosis during phacoemulsification and also maintained the mydriasis throughout the procedure as compared to topical flurbiprofen, ketorolac and placebo.

Authors and Affiliations

Supriya Mushrif, Kaynat Patel

Keywords

Related Articles

 FISH BOWL TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR II ND YEAR MBBS STUDENTS IN AIMSR

 BACKGROUND Many students are not attentive and active during lecture classes in a Medical College. There are a variety of ways to engage students in the classroom that complement the lecture material by initiat...

 A STUDY ON DYSLIPIDAEMIA IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE (CKD) WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HAEMODIALYSIS

 Dyslipidaemia is a common complication of CKD. It is also an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease, which is a major cause of mortality in these patients. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES  To study the levels of...

MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY- AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT OPTION FOR LOWER URETERIC CALCULI

BACKGROUND This is a prospective randomized trial to study the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric calculi. Ureteral stones are a global health issue. Almost 20% of urinary tract stones are found in...

 RETAINED PLACENTA IN AN UNICORNUATE UTERUS: A CASE REPORT

  Manual removal of placenta is a common obstetric procedure performed in the third stage of labor as a treatment of the retained placenta when it is undelivered for more than 30 minutes, according to WHO.[1] The in...

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND AETIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF MICROBIAL KERATITIS: GUIDELINES FOR ITS TREATMENT

BACKGROUND Globally, it is estimated that ocular trauma and corneal ulceration result in 1.5–2 million cases of corneal blindness annually. 90% of such patients hail from developing countries, where the lesion has now be...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP213292
  • DOI 10.14260/Jemds/2017/689
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Supriya Mushrif, Kaynat Patel (2017). COMPARISON OF PREOPERATIVE TOPICAL NEPAFENAC (0.1%), FLURBIPROFEN (0.03%) AND KETOROLAC (0.4%) EYE DROPS IN MAINTAINING MYDRIASIS DURING PHACOEMULSIFICATION- A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 6(40), 3189-3192. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-213292