Comparison of Propofol and Thiopentone as anaesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy - A prospective, double blinded cross over trial

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: The ideal anaesthetic agent for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) should provide a smooth, rapid induction and recovery with minimal antagonistic effect on the seizure activity. We compared two induction agents- Propofol and Thiopentone for their effects on hemodynamic response, seizure duration and recovery characteristics during ECT. Method: We conducted a double blinded randomized repeated measure cross over trial in 50 patients planned for ECT under General Anaesthesia. Each patient received four sittings of ECT and the induction agent was alternated in each sitting. The main aim was to compare the duration of seizure activity, recovery time, hemodynamic parameters measured prior to induction and at various intervals after the conclusion of ECT among the two group: Group P (Propofol) and Group T (Thiopentone). Results: Maximal increase in Heart rate for both the groups, Group T(111.01/min ±17.62) and Group P (99.41/min ±16.97) was in the third minute with a higher increase in Group T. Peak Systolic blood pressure for both the groups was seen at the 3 mins, with a significant increase in Group T(165.79 mmHg ±23.87) than Group P(139.57 mmHg ± 16.28). Group T had a higher diastolic blood pressure (102.42 mmHg ±20.24) in the first minute when compared to Group P ( 88.18mmHg ±15.52) which also exhibited maximal increase in the diastolic blood pressure in the first minute. The seizure duration was shorter in Group P (19.65seconds ± 8.46) than Group T (27.98 seconds ± 10.97) seconds. Patients of Group T had a longer recovery time (10.39min±5.74) than Group P (7min±1.87). Conclusion: Propofol has better hemodynamic response with early recovery than Thiopentone and can be safely concluded as an ideal anaesthetic agent for ECT despite its effect on the seizure duration.

Authors and Affiliations

Anand B, Nimi G, Selvakumaran ***

Keywords

Related Articles

A comparative study midazolam versus propofol for sedation during regional anaesthesia at tertiary health care centre

Background: Conscious sedation is being widely used in various diagnostic, surgical and therapeutic procedures. Its use in spinal anesthesia is becoming increasingly popular. Aims and Objectives: To study Midazolam versu...

Study of post spinal anesthesia hearing loss:A hospital based study

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is one of the most frequent regional anaesthesia techniques in surgical interventions, being used in all procedures below the umbilicus. Hearing loss following spinal anaesthesia is a known...

Comparison of intracuff dexamethasone, lignocaine and normal saline on post extubation response - A prospective study

Background: Endotracheal intubation, being a definitive method has been known to cause post-intubation airway related adverse effects, including postoperative cough, restlessness, hoarseness, sore throat, bronchospasm, a...

A prospective study of comparison of control of bleeding with tranexamic acid vs placebo in acute trauma patients

In our trauma care centre we receive around 2000 cases per month ranging from Polytrauma, Faciomaxillary injury, Both bone fracture Upper limb, Lower limb, Vascular trauma, Abdominal injuries of patients of variable age...

Comparative assessment of side effects of etomidate and propofol: A double blinded study from urban Karnataka

Background: Propofol and Etomidate is commonly used in anaesthesia practice. However pain on injection and myoclonus are the most common side effects of this drug. Objectives: To compare the side effects between Etomidat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP266286
  • DOI -
  • Views 173
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anand B, Nimi G, Selvakumaran *** (2018). Comparison of Propofol and Thiopentone as anaesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy - A prospective, double blinded cross over trial. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 5(1), 6-10. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-266286