Comparison of Public Investment Approaches on Social Welfare Function: A Case Study of Iran

Journal Title: Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications - Year 2019, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

The use of natural resource revenues for achievement of development has been a challenging issue for resource abundant countries. These challenges stem from the fact that incomes from natural resources are non-durable, unpredictable and uncertain. Different countries have pursued various approaches and tools for managing these revenues to avoid economic fluctuations. The international organizations and economic experts propose a diversification in the use of resource revenues through different approaches of public investment. Maximizing the social welfare function has become a common guideline for resource revenue management in resource-rich countries. This article investigates the effect of public investment approaches and their impacts on intergenerational social welfare function of Iran. To this end, the impact of two public investment approaches, namely Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH) and Bird In Hand (BIH), was examined and compared on a certainty equivalent of social welfare function. Results of the simulation with Iran's economic data indicated substantial positive loss in welfare if switching to the BIH approach. Calculations show that the certainty equivalent of social welfare function for PIH and BIH is 786.3 and 444.3, respectively. PIH provides a higher welfare level for the Iranian economy.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohammadhasan Fotros, Esmael Torkamani

Keywords

Related Articles

Taylor Rule: A Model for the Mechanism of Monetary Policy and Inflation Control in the Framework of the Interest-Free Banking Act

The ultimate goal of monetary policy is to achieve price stability and high output. In this regard, central banks usually change the interest rate, liquidity, and money base in order to apply monetary policies. The John...

Impact of Long-term Debt on Overinvestment Problem of Agency

Business units are always faced with investment opportunities and need to make logical decisions on an optimal investment. Indeed, the investment of each business unit should be done with regard to the resource constrain...

Replacing IFRS instead of Iranian accounting standard

Accounting standards, are rules governing how to do accounting work, and specify what information must be provided in financial reporting. The main objective of this study was to compare the stronger accounting standards...

Evaluation of the association between company performance and Iran’s stock market liquidity

This research studies the companies’ effectiveness and performance relationship with stock market liquidity in Tehran Stock Exchange during 2010-2015. Simultaneously, in the study, the three indicators: return on assets,...

Assessment of the efficiency of banks accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange using the data envelopment analysis technique

The research provides a systematic method for assessing the financial performance of the banks. The analysis is based on a set of benchmarks related to the financial performance of the banks. In this regard, this researc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP658567
  • DOI 10.22034/amfa.2019.583257.1166
  • Views 55
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohammadhasan Fotros, Esmael Torkamani (2019). Comparison of Public Investment Approaches on Social Welfare Function: A Case Study of Iran. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 4(2), 89-101. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-658567