COMPARISON OF RANKING RESULTS OBTAINED BY TOPSIS AND VIKOR METHODS, USING THE SAME CRITERIA AS TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKING

Journal Title: European Journal of Business and Social Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Nowadays, the increase of competition among universities on a local and global basis reveals for the individuals and institutions the need of ranking universities, considering many different comparable criteria with regard to universities. There are many different world universities rankings, prepared by different institutions for this purpose, and results of which are shared with public every year. In this study, firstly the history of university rankings in the world has been discussed and the rankings of the world universities according to the world university ranking criteria have been described. In the second part of the study, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods, the multicriteria decision making methods used in practice, have theoretically been explained. In the next section, the universities have been re-ranked according to the TOPSIS and VIKOR methods, using the same world university ranking criteria. At the consequence part of the study, the world university ranking has been evaluated comparing the world universities rankings each other, obtained according to TOPSIS and VIKOR methods. The purpose of this study is the application of the TOPSIS and VIKOR methods to reveal the university rankings, any relevant example of which haven’t been available in the literature, and to compare the findings of these rankings with those of the rankings obtained by THEWUR. Another aim of the study is to reveal whether ranking numbers vary in those performed by different methods. Based on the fact that university rankings do not differ according to methods using the same criteria and weights, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated and the results were evaluated.

Authors and Affiliations

Seda BAĞDATLI KALKAN| PhD, İstanbul Commerce University, Münevver TURANLI| PhD, İstanbul Commerce University, Ünal H. ÖZDEN| PhD, İstanbul Commerce University, Özlem DENİZ BAŞAR| PhD, İstanbul Commerce University

Keywords

Related Articles

RELIGIOUS ENVIRONMENTALISM: THE CHURCH’S ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY PARADIGM (THE CASE OF THE CHURCH OF PENTECOST IN GHANA)

The current environmental crises that ravage the planet earth and threaten its capacity to be a home for all living creatures and non-living elements of nature needs to be addressed radically and immediately at all l...

GENRE ET RECONSTRUCTION DU LIEN SOCIAL DANS UN CONTEXTE POST-CRISE : UNE ILLUSTRATION DES ORGANISATIONS FEMININES DANS DES MILIEUX RURAUX DE L’OUEST DE LA COTE D’IVOIRE

Les femmes sont souvent exclues des structures formelles de gestion et de prévention des conflits dans la société ivoirienne en général et en particulier dans leurs propres communautés. Malgré ce fait, elles on...

CUSTOMERS’ PREFERENCE IN SERVICE DELIVERY, AN ASSESSMENT OF TAM AND IDT ON THE MEANS-END THEORY IN THE BANKING INDUSTRY: A CASE OF GHANA COMMERCIAL BANK Ltd IN GHANA

Electronic banking is ubiquitous in recent banking and has recently gained numerous researches because of it numerous advantages it offer for both banks and clients. Unlike developing and newly industrialized countrie...

CORRUPTION IN JORDAN- REALITY AND CHALLENGES

Corruption is a scourge of carcinogenic invade the entire world community in general, and in the Middle East communities in particular and in the Jordanian society accurately. The most important challenges facing the f...

ROLE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE

Performance appraisal policy has been viewed by organizations and human resources practitioners as an effective tool for human resources management. However, effective performance appraisal policy remains a practical...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP10882
  • DOI -
  • Views 373
  • Downloads 13

How To Cite

Seda BAĞDATLI KALKAN, Münevver TURANLI, Ünal H. ÖZDEN, Özlem DENİZ BAŞAR (2017). COMPARISON OF RANKING RESULTS OBTAINED BY TOPSIS AND VIKOR METHODS, USING THE SAME CRITERIA AS TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKING. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 6(1), 107-122. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-10882