COMPARISON OF RIPASA AND ALVARADO SCORING SYSTEM IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS- A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 15

Abstract

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of an acute abdomen requiring surgery with a lifetime risk of about 7%. Even with recent advances in imaging modalities, considerable morbidity continues to be associated with appendicitis. Diagnostic delay leads to perforation and other complications increasing the morbidity. Scoring systems were introduced to reduce the rate of negative appendicectomy. Alvarado designed a 10-point clinical scoring system, where a score of ≥ 7 warrants appendicectomy. Recently, RIPASA scoring system was implemented to overcome the problems with Alvarado scoring system based on 14 fixed clinical parameters, where a score of ≥ 7.5 warrants a surgical intervention. Our study compares the Alvarado and RIPASA scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis and correlate with histopathological findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS The descriptive study with patients who presented to our Emergency/ General Surgery Department from January 2016 to October 2016 with right iliac fossa pain and who were suspected of acute appendicitis were considered for the study. Of them, hundred patients who satisfied our inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study. A detailed history, clinical examination and laboratory investigations were done for all. Scores were obtained for all the patients using both the Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems. All the patients underwent appendicectomy. Histopathological diagnosis was considered as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for both these scorings were calculated and analysed comparatively with a Chi-square test. RESULTS Out of 100 patients, 57 were male and 43 were female. Both the scoring system were obtained and correlated with histopathological findings. As per Alvarado scoring, 58 patients had a score of ≥ 7 and 42 patients had a score of < 7. On applying the RIPASA scoring system, 73 patients had a score of ≥ 7.5 and 27 patients had a score of < 7.5. The specimens of all the hundred patients were examined, of which 74 showed features of acute appendicitis histopathologically. The sensitivity of Alvarado and RIPASA was 68.92% and 91.89% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 70% by Alvarado compared to 89% by RIPASA. The negative appendectomy rate by Alvarado scoring was 12.06% and 6.85% by RIPASA. CONCLUSION Our study concluded that RIPASA score is a simple and rapid system with higher sensitivity compared to the Alvarado score. The NPV (Negative Predictive Value) and diagnostic accuracy was also higher with RIPASA scoring system in our study population. Hence, RIPASA scoring system is better than Alvarado scoring system in establishing the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors and Affiliations

Thameen Ansara S, Vishnu Kumar S

Keywords

Related Articles

A STUDY ON HISTOPATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NECK SWELLINGS IN SURGICAL OUTPATIENTS- AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

BACKGROUND Neck swelling is a common presentation in the course of number of diseases. Since neck swelling is not a manifestation of a single disease, diagnosis becomes very difficult and it requires a strong knowledge a...

CORRELATION OF LENGTH OF FEMUR WITH ITS PROXIMAL FRAGMENTS- A MORPHOMETRIC STUDY

BACKGROUND The stature of an individual is used to establish the identity of a person medicolegally. The stature is calculated from the length of long bones. This study is an effort to derive regression equations for the...

HYPOCALCAEMIA DUE TO PHOTOTHERAPY IN TERM NEONATES WITH NEONATAL HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA

BACKGROUND Jaundice is an important problem in the first week of life.1,2 It is a cause for concern for the physician and a source of anxiety for the parents. High bilirubin level may be toxic to the developing central n...

&nbsp; MULLERIAN DUCT ANOMALIES: A STUDY ON ANATOMICAL BASIS WITH EMBRYOLOGICAL ASPECTS AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE IN SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION - MADURANTHAGAM REGION

&nbsp;[b] AIMS &amp; OBJECTIVES: [/b]Mullerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are rare, but it can be a&nbsp;treatable form of infertility, affecting approximately 1% to 5% of women in general population and&nbsp;the rate increas...

A STUDY OF DETECTION OF MYCOBACTERIA BY FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY IN IMPRINT SMEAR AND ZIEHL-NEELSEN STAIN IN TISSUE SECTION FROM SKIN BIOPSY SPECIMEN

BACKGROUND Over the years, a number of methods have been tried to detect the presence of Mycobacteria in tissue samples. A number of previous literatures are available comparing the efficacy of fluorescent microscopy wit...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP414473
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2018/422
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Thameen Ansara S, Vishnu Kumar S (2018). COMPARISON OF RIPASA AND ALVARADO SCORING SYSTEM IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS- A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(15), 1872-1876. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-414473