Comparison of technical and economic efficiency of extended aeration and sequencing batch reactors processes in hospital wastewater treatment

Journal Title: Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research (JAEHR) - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Wastewater of hospitals can cause many risks to public health due to having a variety of pathogenic microorganisms, pharmaceutical substances, and other hazardous toxic substances. The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical quality of effluents from wastewater treatment plant of Falsafi Hospital and Hakim Jorjani Hospital in Gorgan, Iran, and to compare them technically and economically. This descriptive-analytical study was performed on 64 samples of raw wastewater entrance and output effluent obtained from treatment plants using extended aeration process and sequencing batch reactors (SBR) in two hospitals in Gorgan. All experiments for determination of pH, free residual chlorine, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total suspended solids (TSS) were performed using standard methods. Finally, the obtained data were analyzed using t-test and Mann-Whitney test in SPSS software. Based on the results, the removal efficiency of BOD, COD, and TSS of the extended aeration system was 91, 90.8, and 95.7 percent, respectively, while these values for the SBR system were found to be 91.7, 91.9, and 95.3 Percent, respectively. Moreover, in the output of the two hospitals, pH values were recorded as 6.69 ± 0.26 and 7.33 ± 0.2 and the average amount of free residual chlorine was 0.12 and 0.13 mg/l, respectively. This study demonstrates good performances of the extended aeration activated sludge system and the SBR system in terms of reduction of pollution load to its standard limits for agriculture and irrigation purposes. However, due to slightly better efficiency, lower cost of investment, and operation compared to other methods, the SBR system is recommended.

Authors and Affiliations

Arezoo Heidari, Mahdi Sadeghi, Abotaleb Bay, Jalal Keihanpour, Elham Omidi, Khadijeh Bay, Mahmoud Tabatabaei

Keywords

Related Articles

Physical, chemical, and microbial quality of drinking water in Sanandaj, Iran

Drinkability of water is determined based on its physical, chemical, and microbial properties. Undesirable changes in these parameters could threaten the health of consumers. The present study aimed to assess the physica...

Characteristics and disposal options of sludge from a steel mill wastewater treatment plant

In the present study, sludge from a steel wastewater treatment plant (SWWTP) was analyzed regarding its physicochemical characteristics and metal contents, and disposal options. For these purposes, grab sampling was used...

Assessment of Aquatic Environmental Quallty Using Gyrodactylus sp. as a Living Probe: Parasitic Biomonitoring of Ecosystem Health

Biological indicators are species that can be employed to monitor environmental quality and ecosystem health. Different groups of organisms such as plants, animals, bacteria and parasites regularly produce certain molecu...

Failures analysis of water distribution network during 2006-2008 in Ahvaz, Iran

Failures in the water distribution network are some most important factors in water losses, water shortage and dissatisfaction of users and secondary pollutions as well. This research aimed to analyze failure in water di...

The study of azo dye removal from liquid medium by modified clay

In this batch study, montmorillonite was modified by a cationic surfactant [hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HDTMA-MMT)] and used as sorbent to remove bromocresol green (BCG) from aqueous solutions. The effect of seve...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP423928
  • DOI 10.22102/jaehr.2016.40220
  • Views 144
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Arezoo Heidari, Mahdi Sadeghi, Abotaleb Bay, Jalal Keihanpour, Elham Omidi, Khadijeh Bay, Mahmoud Tabatabaei (2016). Comparison of technical and economic efficiency of extended aeration and sequencing batch reactors processes in hospital wastewater treatment. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research (JAEHR), 4(1), 54-61. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-423928