Comparison of Two Survey Methods Based on Response Distribution of Pediatricians Regarding Immunization for Children in India: Mail versus Telephone

Journal Title: International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health - Year 2016, Vol 16, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: The use of telephone and mail surveys raises the question to what extent the results of different data collection methods deviate from one another. Aim: To determine if there is any difference in the response distribution between telephone and mail surveys of vaccination related-attitudes. Methods: A random sample of 400 pediatricians who are members of the India Academy of Pediatrics and work at various locations in India was selected. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was applied; significance level was alpha=0.05. Difference in percentage points of the majority response was calculated in the following way ∆=telephone% - mail%. Results: Only 36% responded to mail surveys and 57% responded to telephone surveys. Pediatricians in both telephone and mail surveys agreed for the majority of survey questions but to a different degree on particular items. More pediatricians in the telephone arm responded that measles eradication is important with a p=0.001 and ∆=8.3. More mail than telephone respondents reported that it is parents’ responsibility to ensure child is vaccinated (∆= -7.9, P=0.002) and that they would refer parents to a facility of their choice to get vaccines (∆=14, P=0.008). Conclusion: The results show evidence of the interviewer and/or social desirability bias and its influence on response choices. This suggests that mode of administration should be standardized or carefully adjusted for during analysis. Alternatively, further question development may minimize the sensitivity of items to mode of data collection.

Authors and Affiliations

Roy L. Zhang, Naveen Thacker, Panna Choudhury, Karen Pazol, Walter A. Orenstein, Saad B. Omer, James M. Hughes, Paul S. Weiss, Lisa M. Gargano

Keywords

Related Articles

Efficacy of Fluorescence Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Guyana

Background: Tuberculosis is one of the potentially serious human diseases and is still one of the major causes of mortality. It ranks as the second most leading cause of death from a single infectious agent, after the hu...

Herbal Medicines Used in the Treatment of Typhoid in the Ga East Municipality of Ghana

In Ghana, majority of the people patronize herbal medicines for the treatment of both chronic and acute ailments as well as infectious and non-infectious diseases. As such, the use of herbs as medicines in the treatment...

Cryptosporidial Diarrhoea in Children at a Paediatric Hospital in Accra, Ghana

Background: Diarrhoeal diseases are common among children in developing countries, and are caused by several aetiological agents including Cryptosporidium sp. Several species of this parasite exist which may belong to e...

The Influence of Antiepileptic Drugs Alteration as Adjunctive Therapy of Drug Induced Gingival Enlargement among Epileptic Patients in Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia

Background: Drug induced gingival enlargement is a common clinical finding among epileptic patients who are under medical care. This gingival enlargement is generally managed by different methods as scaling and polishing...

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Hand Hygiene among Healthcare Providers in Semi-urban Communities of Sokoto State, Nigeria

Introduction: Healthcare providers have been identified as the most common vehicle for transmission of hospital acquired infections (HAIs) from patient to patient and within the healthcare environment. Large proportions...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP329081
  • DOI 10.9734/IJTDH/2016/24051
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Roy L. Zhang, Naveen Thacker, Panna Choudhury, Karen Pazol, Walter A. Orenstein, Saad B. Omer, James M. Hughes, Paul S. Weiss, Lisa M. Gargano (2016). Comparison of Two Survey Methods Based on Response Distribution of Pediatricians Regarding Immunization for Children in India: Mail versus Telephone. International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health, 16(2), 1-10. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-329081