Comparison of Undergraduate Nursing Education in Iran and George Washington University

Journal Title: Educational Research in Medical Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: The strategic plans of nursing are in line with training the nurses that are able to make positive changes in the caring environment and to improve the life quality of individuals, families, and community. Each country has different methods of nursing education, which are rooted in its customs and traditions. Comparing different educational systems promotes the content and quality of the curriculum. This study performed a comparative study of nursing education in Iran and George Washington University. Methods: This comparative study was conducted in 2016 to compare the constituents of Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) program in Iran and George Washington University in the United States. The Beredy model was used to compare the collected data, which encompasses description, interpretation, juxtaposition, and comparison. Results: Although nursing education in Iran is mostly influenced by education models in the United States, the two countries have major differences in their nursing education system. BSN in Iran is a four-year program and has a semester system. The students are selected from among the candidates of experimental sciences through a nationwide university entrance examination. In all universities across Iran, one curriculum is presented, and there is limited flexibility in the program due to environmental conditions, while BSN in the United States has a two-year program, and student admission regulations are formulated independently by each university. The number of compulsory units is 130 units in Iran and 180 units in the United States. Conclusion: The nursing curricula in Iran and George Washington University have differences and similarities. Thus, considering the cultural, social, historical and economic differences, comparing them can be helpful to solve the problems and challenges in nursing education.

Authors and Affiliations

Rostam Jalali, Fatemeh Rigi, Naser Parizad, Zainab Amirian

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of Nurses’ Professional Behaviour in the Educational Settings and the Workplaces

Introduction: Activities of a nurse are not limited to his/her knowledge and skills in the management of patients, but they need to have some characteristics related to their job. These characteristics in general are ref...

Educational Status of Dental Basic Science Course and its Correlation with Students' Educational Background in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

Introduction: Basic science course plays a pivotal role in the academic achievement of the students. The scientific background and educational performance of the students are also influential in this period. The aim of t...

Perspectives of Residents of Mashhad School of Dentistry about the Curriculum of Residency Program

Introduction: This study was carried out to analyze the viewpoint of the residents of school of dentistry about the curriculum presented in the residency program to students of Mashhad School of Dentistry. Methods: To...

Knowledge of General Dentists and Dental Specialists in Kermanshah about Periradicular Surgery

Introduction: Periradicular surgery is an appropriate treatment method for dental periradicular impairments. The present study was carried out to analyze the knowledge of general dentists and dental specialists about per...

Interactive Role of Organizational Learning and Informal Norms in Accountability and Job Performance in 2014

Introduction: Although the contribution of organizational learning to employee organizational performance is well documented, the mechanisms that explain such relationship remain unclear. Accordingly, the purpose of this...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP196290
  • DOI -
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rostam Jalali, Fatemeh Rigi, Naser Parizad, Zainab Amirian (2016). Comparison of Undergraduate Nursing Education in Iran and George Washington University. Educational Research in Medical Sciences, 5(2), 64-73. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-196290