Comparison of Water, Mannitol and Positive Oral Contrast for Evaluation of Bowel By Computed Tomography

Journal Title: International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: Small bowel remains a challenging anatomical site. Imaging approaches like CT-enterography helps in diagnosing non specific clinical presentations and imaging aids in appropriate management. Hence, bowel evaluation by CT requires a oral contrast agent for diagnosing the bowel pathology. Thus, quantitative and qualitative analysis of three oral contrast agents i.e., water, mannitol and positive contrast was done for identification of ideal intraluminal contrast agent. Aim: To assess the performance of mannitol as an endoluminal contrast agent as compared to water and positive contrast in the evaluation of bowel, to compare the distention of bowel with different oral contrasts and also to assess the usefulness of bowel distension in assessment of mural enhancement pattern of bowel. Materials and Methods: A comparative observational study was performed which consisted of 75 patients who were divided into three groups of 25 patients each. Patients in each group were given 1500 ml of oral contrast. Group I was given mannitol, Group II was given water and Group III was given positive contrast. Assessments of bowel distention at various levels and mural enhancement of bowel were studied. Chisquare test was used as test of significance for qualitative data. ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was the test of significance for quantitative data. Results: Bowel distention was excellent in mannitol compared to water and positive contrast. Wall enhancement and mural pattern was better appreciated with mannitol compared to other two contrast agents. Conclusion: Adequate bowel evaluation by CT requires an oral contrast agent which can cause maximal bowel distention, uniform intraluminal attenuation, increased contrast between intraluminal content and bowel wall with no artifacts and adverse effects. Mannitol has all the above characteristic and can be used as ideal neutral oral contrast agent.

Authors and Affiliations

padhmanaban elamparidhi, Selvakkalanjiyam Sivaranjanie, rudrappa ramesh kumar, rajkumar sibhithran, a. amaresh kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

Laparoscopic Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforation - Single Centre Experience

ABSTRACT Introduction: Laparotomy with peritoneal lavage and perforation repair is the standard management of perforated peptic ulcer. But the open surgery is associated with increased morbidity and delay in returning to...

Sexual Dimorphism in Adult Human Mandibles: a Southern Indian Study

Introduction: The mandible is a Latin word which means lower jaw. The word mandible is derived from “Mandere” which means to chew. The mandible is the largest, strongest and lower jaw bone in the face. It has lower teeth...

Cadaveric Study of Supraclavicular Part of Brachial Plexus

Introduction: Brachial plexus is network of nerves present in the neck and axilla supplying the upper limb. It is formed by the ventral rami of lower four cervical and first thoracic nerves. Surgical intervention in axil...

Intradiverticular Bladder Carcinoma-A Rare Case Report

The most common intradiverticular malignancy is urothelial cancer. Bladder diverticula can be caused either by congenital or acquired defects which results in out pouching of the bladder wall. Intradiverticular urothelia...

A Comparative Evaluation of Various Imaging Findings with Per Operative Findings in Acute Abdomen

Introduction: Abdominal pain, severe in nature, that requires immediate medical and or surgical care may be referred to as acute abdomen. In view of its morbidity and mortality, it becomes essential for a prompt and accu...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP369896
  • DOI 10.7860/IJARS/2017/29481:2316
  • Views 136
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

padhmanaban elamparidhi, Selvakkalanjiyam Sivaranjanie, rudrappa ramesh kumar, rajkumar sibhithran, a. amaresh kumar (2017). Comparison of Water, Mannitol and Positive Oral Contrast for Evaluation of Bowel By Computed Tomography. International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery, 6(4), 13-17. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-369896