Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Standard preference models in consumer research assume that people weigh and add all attributes of the available options to derive a decision, while there is growing evidence for the use of simplifying heuristics. Recently, a greedoid algorithm has been developed (Yee, Dahan, Hauser & Orlin, 2007; Kohli & Jedidi, 2007) to model lexicographic heuristics from preference data. We compare predictive accuracies of the greedoid approach and standard conjoint analysis in an online study with a rating and a ranking task. The lexicographic model derived from the greedoid algorithm was better at predicting ranking compared to rating data, but overall, it achieved lower predictive accuracy for hold-out data than the compensatory model estimated by conjoint analysis. However, a considerable minority of participants was better predicted by lexicographic strategies. We conclude that the new algorithm will not replace standard tools for analyzing preferences, but can boost the study of situational and individual differences in preferential choice processes.

Authors and Affiliations

Anja Dieckmann, Katrin Dippold, and Holger Dietrich

Keywords

Related Articles

Trade-upgrade framing effects: Trades are losses, but upgrades are improvements

In two studies, people were reluctant to trade items they own, but glad to accept upgrades with identical end states. The framing of the transaction makes a difference. A mediational analysis suggests that the relationsh...

Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals

This study analyzes the relative accuracy of experts, polls, and the so-called ‘fundamentals’ in predicting the popular vote in the four U.S. presidential elections from 2004 to 2016. Although the majority (62%) of 452 e...

How should we measure Americans’ perceptions of socio-economic mobility?

Several scholars have suggested that Americans’ (distorted) beliefs about the rate of upward social mobility in the United States may affect political judgment and decision-making outcomes. In this article, we consider t...

Reversing the causal arrow: Incidence and properties of negative backward magical contagion in Americans

Backward magical contagion describes instances in which individuals (sources) express discomfort or pleasure when something connected to them (medium; e.g., hair, a diary) falls into the possession of a negatively- or po...

Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in goal penalty shootouts

Previous research has reported that the gambler’s fallacy could be detected in goalkeepers’ behavior during penalty shootouts. Following repeated kicks in the same direction, goalkeepers were more likely to dive in the o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677678
  • DOI -
  • Views 177
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anja Dieckmann, Katrin Dippold, and Holger Dietrich (2009). Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677678