Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: Can the heterogeneous implementation be explained?

Journal Title: Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości - Year 2019, Vol 2019, Issue 101

Abstract

Starting with the Cadbury code in 1992, various national and international Corporate Governance (CG) codes have been issued all over the world. So far, empirical studies have revealed mixed results concerning the effects and outcomes of code implementation and thus supported the hypothesis of a ‘one system does not fit all’ approach in CG. Therefore, this paper empirically analyses influence factors on compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code for a large sample of 306 listed firms in 2015. We chose German companies because of the specific institutional settings in Germany, e.g., the strong influence of founder families on a firm’s management or the relevance of debt financing. It is assumed that the country-specific institutional setting limits the transferability of results of US and UK studies. Thus, we used the German setting to derive relevant influence factors on Code compliance. In addition, we applied a more sophisticated measure of Code implementation than previous studies. Overall, we find a significant positive effect of ownership dispersion and firm size on Code compliance, whereas the other influence factors, e.g., family influence or the supervisory board’s size, reveal the right direction of impact but not the required level of statistically significance. In contrast to institutional theory, we find a negative although statistically insignificant impact of the strength of foreign investors’ influence on Code compliance. Overall, our results indicate that the institutional setting is not decisive for Code compliance. Instead, we assume that the main rationale for Code compliance is not the reduction of agency conflicts but the alignment with peer group practices as indicated by the variable company size. Future research should investigate the peer effects on the level of Code compliance in detail.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Karsten Eisenschmidt, Ute Vanini

Keywords

Related Articles

Rachunkowość zarządcza w zarządzaniu łańcuchem dostaw w świetle wyników badań literaturowych i ankietowych

Koncepcja zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw ewoluowała w szybkim tempie w praktyce gospodarczej, a także w badaniach naukowych, przede wszystkim z zakresu logistyki i łańcuchów dostaw. Stanowi ona również punkt odniesienia dl...

The perceived impact of accreditation on the quality of academic accounting education: students` perspective

The last few years have been a period of intensive accreditation processes concerning accounting majors in Polish universities by institutions which confirm accounting qualifications. Our paper aims to investi- gate the...

Prezentacja dochodów całkowitych zgodnie z MSR 1: praktyki sprawozdawcze największych spółek notowanych na GPW w Warszawie

Od 2009 r. spółki notowane na giełdach papierów wartościowych w Unii Europejskiej mają obowią-zek prezentowania dochodu całkowitego (CI) w skonsolidowanych sprawozdaniach finansowych na mocy Międzynarodowego Standardu Ra...

Religious audit in the Islamic perspective – selected issues

The purpose of the article is to identify the specific characteristics of religious audit performed in Muslim financial institutions. The thesis put forward in the study is that cultural (religious) identity, determining...

Financial and non-financial information in the integrated report – the practice of companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange

The main aim of the article is to attempt to classify the integrated report as a financial or non-financial report by analyzing its information content. The article also aims to determine how the form of the integrated...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP518547
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0013.0761
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Karsten Eisenschmidt, Ute Vanini (2019). Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: Can the heterogeneous implementation be explained?. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 2019(101), 167-200. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-518547