Conciliar Christology and the Problem of Incompatible Predications

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

In this article I canvas the options available to a proponent of the traditional doctrine of the incarnation against a charge of incoherence. In particular, I consider the charge of incoherence due to incompatible predications both being true of the same one person, the God-man Jesus Christ. For instance, one might think that anything divine has to have certain attributes – perhaps omnipotence, or impassibility. But, the charge continues, nothing human can be omnipotent or impassible. And so nothing can be divine and human. So Christ is not both God and man, contrary to the traditional doctrine of the incarnation. To do so, first, in Section II, I will present the problem as a deductively valid argument. I then, in that section, go on to show that the proponent of traditional Christology should grant all but one premise of the argument. In the remaining sections I will canvas possible solutions to the problem. In Section III I discuss three ways to deny Premise 3 of the forthcoming argument. These ways include a Kenotic response, qua-modification (in four versions), and finally a response that accepts the compatibility of the allegedly incompatible predicates.

Authors and Affiliations

Timothy Pawl

Keywords

Related Articles

Wstęp

Słowo wstępne

Oracles, Prophets and the Exoteric Circles of Science and Religion

Drawing upon Karl Giberson and Mariano Artigas’ joint book The Oracles of Science, I discuss the limits of an emphasis on so-called philosophical bridges in the relationship between science and religion. Epistemological...

The Significance of Being Ethical: An essay on the case for moral realism and theism

William Irwin defends a form of moral anti-realism, according to which there are no objective moral facts. He contends that moral realism is objectionable because of its being more complex or not as simple as anti-realis...

The Hard Problem of Consciousness in the Light of Onto-Gnoseological Uncertainty

Purpose: The main purpose of this article is to show that the paradigm of viewing the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness in analytic philosophy makes it a pseudo-problem rather than a ‘hard problem’. The objectives of this...

La fiabilidad teórica del determinismo. Un examen desde la propuesta de Mariano Artigas

The theoretical reliability of determinism. A review from the proposal of Mariano Artigas This article has two purposes. The first is to demonstrate that the theory of determinism, which claims to be based on the princi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP194969
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2015.019
  • Views 58
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Timothy Pawl (2015). Conciliar Christology and the Problem of Incompatible Predications. Scientia et Fides, 3(2), 85-106. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-194969