Consent for surgery in view of an ambigious court decision – case report
Journal Title: Polish Journal of Surgery - Year 2015, Vol 87, Issue 12
Abstract
Guardianship courts seem to issue decisions in case of the need to obtain consent for surgery, amongst other things, when the patient is unable to consciously express written consent, and at the same time does not have a legal representative or a statutory representative does exist, but settlement with him is impossible. The presented study case demonstrated the abnormalities of applying court procedures, as well as the responsibilities and dilemmas posed in front of a surgeon. A specialist surgeon wanted to help the patient and he was able to accomplish his mission.
Authors and Affiliations
Teresa Lewińska, Andrzej Modrzejewski, Mirosław Parafiniuk
Surgical treatment of extra-appendiceal colorectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Background: Extra-appendiceal colorectal neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms with a variable biological behavior. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 15 patients with an extra-appendiceal colorecta...
Giant Splenic Hematoma can be a Hidden Condition
An otherwise healthy 28-year old male presented to his general practitioner with dyspnoea in the morning and abdominal discomfort through months. Four months earlier, he had experienced a blunt trauma to the left side of...
Leczenie chirurgiczne guzów neuroendokrynnych jelita grubego w lokalizacji pozawyrostkowej
Wstęp: Guzy neuroendokrynne jelita grubego w lokalizacji pozawyrostkowej stanowią rzadkie nowotwory przewodu pokarmowego o zróżnicowanym charakterze biologicznym. Materiały i Metody: Grupę badaną stanowiło 15 chorych l...
Cell Adhesion Molecules in Terms of Carcinogenesis
Impact of Fast-Track Concept Elements in the Classical Pancreatic Head Resection (Kausch-Whipple Procedure)