CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL

Abstract

The judicial control on bail is one of the five preventive measures provided by the New Criminal Procedure Code. The faulty way of regulating the preventive measure of judicial control on bail has determined an extremely low applicability of this preventive measure in the judicial practice of our country. Both in doctrine and jurisprudence there is controversy over the procedure to be followed in order to take the measure of judicial control on bail. In a doctrinal opinion it was shown that there is a preliminary stage of admissibility in principle and that the provisions of art. 242 C.P.P. shall be applied by analogy. This is one of the problems we intend to analyze in our study. In the Western countries legislation, such a measure is widespread, being considered a viable alternative to the deprivation of liberty. The threat of losing a very large amount of money will obviously cause the defendant to weigh heavily the way he respects the obligations imposed by the judicial bodies. The jurisprudential controversies previously described with regards taking this measure, controversies born from the very wording used by the legislator, prompted many prosecutors to be reluctant to order / take such a measure. We hope that in the future, the regulation of judicial control will be given greater attention and this preventive measure will truly become a genuine alternative to custodial preventive measures.

Authors and Affiliations

Andrei-Viorel IUGAN

Keywords

Related Articles

MEDIA MARKET OVERVIEW IN CEE COUNTRIES

Every year, in every market and in any country, advertisers spend increasing budgets on advertising to influence consumer behavior. Finding the ideal marketing channel mix is a continuous challenge for every brand on eve...

THE EUROPEAN UNION DIRECTIVE PROPOSAL ON RESTRUCTURING AND SECOND CHANCE: A CHECK OF COMPLIANCE BY ROMANIAN LAW

The European Commission is highly active in the field of insolvency, by making big steps towards reforming the concept of insolvency, beginning with the Recast of the European Insolvency Regulation, which has entered int...

THE JUDGE’S ROLE OF SURVEILLANCE OF DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY IN THE EXECUTION OF THE CUSTODIAL PENALTIES

In this study, I decided to analyze the activity of the judge of surveillance of deprivation of liberty in relation to the amendments made by Law no. 254/2013 on the execution of sentences and custodial measures ordered...

FREEDOM OF SPEECH. CONSIDERATIONS ON CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S DECISION NO. 649/2018

Pursuant to article 30 paragraph (1) of the Constitution, freedom of expression is inviolable, but according to article 30 paragraphs (6) and (7) of the same Constitution, it cannot prejudice the dignity, honour, private...

THE JUDICIAL TREATMENTN APPLICABLE TO INFRIGEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS ON SETTING AS CIVIL PART IN THE CRIMINAL TRIAL

The admissibility is the equivalent of the permissiveness of the law. A particular act may be prohibited by the law governing the procedure inside which it is performed, but the same approach can be allowed in other judi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP301197
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andrei-Viorel IUGAN (2018). CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 101-106. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-301197