Consistency analysis of differences between VX120 multi-diagnostic unit and TopconKR800 automatic optometer

Journal Title: Eye Science (Yanke Xuebao) - Year 2021, Vol 36, Issue 10

Abstract

[Objective:] The aim of this study was to compare the consistency of objective optometry results between VX120 multi-diagnostic unit and TopconKR800 automatic optometer. [Methods:] A total of 24 patients (24 right eyes) admitted to our hospital from November 2019 to December 2019 for corneal refractive surgery were collected. Optometry was performed on 24 patients with TopconKR800 automatic optometer and VX120 multi-diagnostic unit, and got the results following: spherical mirror photometry (S), cylindrical lens luminosity (C), mean spherical equivalent (M), horizontal and vertical cylindrical lens luminosity (J0) and 45° cylindrical lens luminosity (J45). Compared T-test analysis was used to compare the parameters of the two devices, and the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were performed. [Results:] The S measured by the VX120 multi-diagnostic unit with bright mode was (−3.90±3.06) D; M was (−4.41±3.24) D; J0 was (0.34±0.58) D; J45 was (−0.04±0.26) D. The S measured by TopconKR800 automatic optometer was (−3.77±2.88) D; M was (−4.15±3.07) D; J0 was (0.25±0.47) D; J45 was (−0.01±0.18) D. There was no statistically significant difference in S, M, and J45 measured by VX120 multi-diagnostic unit and TopconKR800 automatic optometer in bright mode, while there was statistically significant difference in J0 between VX120 multi-diagnostic unit and TopconKR800 automatic optometer (t=−2.24, P=0.04). Bland-Altman 95% consistency analysis showed that the data points of the two instruments were mostly distributed within the 95% confidence interval, indicating that the parameters measured by these two devices were in accord with each other. [Conclusion:] The objective optometry results of VX120 multi-diagnostic unit and TopconKR800 automatic optometer were consistent and can be substituted for each other in the refraction examination.

Authors and Affiliations

Huini LIN, Qiuxia LIU, Lixia SUN

Keywords

Related Articles

Survey on teaching needs and satisfaction of the eight-year program medical students to the whole-course tutors

[Objective:] To evaluate the teaching needs and satisfaction of the eight-year program medical students to the whole-course tutors. [Methods:] An anonymous online questionnaire survey was conducted among the eight-year p...

Assessment on the efficacy of video-assisted Wetlab eyelid surgery teaching

[Objective:] To assess the efficacy of video-assisted Wetlab eyelid surgery teaching. [Methods:] From April 2021 to September 2021, the porcine orbit model was used to conduct a Wetlab teaching course on eyelid surgeries...

Correlation between the severity of type 2 diabetic retinopathy and the serum biochemical indexes

[Objective:] To analyze the serum biochemical indexes of different degrees of type 2 diabetic retinopathy, and the correlation between biochemical indexes and the degree of diabetic retinopathy (DR). [Methods:] Patients...

Application value of corneal horizontal diameter and lens thickness in Barrett Universal Ⅱ intraocular lens prediction formula

[Objective:] To investigate the practical application value of the optional parameters of corneal horizontal diameter or white to white (WTW) and lens thickness (LT) a using Barrett Universal II formula. [Methods:] Singl...

Computed tomography and pathological manifestations of space-occupying lesions of the orbital bone and their relevance

[Objective:] To analyze computed tomography (CT) manifestations of space-occupying lesions of the orbital bone and their relationship with histopathology. [Methods:] The clinical data of 15 patients with orbital bone occ...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP763576
  • DOI 10.3978/j.issn.1000-4432.2021.08.08
  • Views 13
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Huini LIN, Qiuxia LIU, Lixia SUN (2021). Consistency analysis of differences between VX120 multi-diagnostic unit and TopconKR800 automatic optometer. Eye Science (Yanke Xuebao), 36(10), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-763576