Correlation Between Contrast Variability and Refractive Error

Journal Title: Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research - Year 2023, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Contrast sensitivity, is defined as the ability to detect the lowest lumination difference between an object and the background. It is one of the main requisites for good quality vision as the eye works by perceiving an object by comparing the difference between the target and the background contrast difference. Aims and Objectives: To assess patterns of contrast sensitivity functions in patients in different types of refractive errors using Pelli Robson chart and also to measure the severity of refractive error within each group and compared the contrast sensitivity function with severity in different types of refractive errors. Material and Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 500 patients (Age range from 10 to 80 years) who presented with chief complaint of refractive errors mainly myopia and hypermetropia. Patients who had previous history of ocular surgery and other ocular co- morbidity were excluded from study. Selected patients were enrolled for the study after taking a written informed consent. The patterns of contrast sensitivity function in different types of refractive errors were recorded on a prescribed proforma with respect to: Visual acuity, type of refractive error, severity of refractive error, duration of refractive error, age of the patient, fundus examination and Contrast sensitivity. Statistical analysis was undertaken with P<0.05 significant. Results: A mild decrease in contrast sensitivity was recorded in majority of patients i.e 250 patients (50%). Maximum decrease in contrast sensitivity was seen in 31-60 years age group. A statistically significant direct correlation (P<0.05) was observed between duration and variation in contrast sensitivity. Both the refractive error showed definite decrease in contrast sensitivity and compound astigmatism showed severe decrease in contrast sensitivity. Conclusion: Despite having BCVA of 6/6, patients showed reduced contrast sensitivity, even without any retinal pathology, making it an essential part of a routine ophthalmic examination.

Authors and Affiliations

Shreya Thatte, Haritima Sharma, Shruti Patidar

Keywords

Related Articles

The Effects of Primary Pterygium on Corneal Endothelial Cells Density in Iraqi Eyes

Pterygium considered as a common inflammatory and proliferative growth that extends across the limbus and can invade the cornea. It had been found that a long standing Pterygium can be associated with the changes in co...

Conjunctival Folliculosis Presenting as Hemolacria

A 13-year-old female reported a one-year history of hemolacria in her left eye following an episode of a migraine attack and anger outburst. Ophthalmic examination revealed inferior fornix follicles with petechia and abs...

Pentacam Anterior Float Anomaly Due to Band Shaped Keratopathy

A 27 year old female with best corrected visual acuity 20/60 and 20/30 in the right (OD) and left (OS) eyes respectively presented to us for refractive surgery. Refractive errors were -9.25 D and -7 D spherical equival...

Awareness About Refractive Error Among Students in Primary Schools

Introduction: The uncorrected Refractive Errors (REs) cause visual impairment in more than 300 million subjects worldwide. Correction of uncorrected REs is a priority of Vision 2020-The Right to Sight. The study aimed to...

Epidemio-Clinical Profile of Onchocerciasis in Sambwa in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Introduction: Onchocerciasis is the second leading cause of infectious blindness. This condition is serious because of its ocular complications. The sickness is caused through a Nematode specifique of I man Ochocerca Vol...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP714379
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.46889/JOAR.2023.4103
  • Views 55
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Shreya Thatte, Haritima Sharma, Shruti Patidar (2023). Correlation Between Contrast Variability and Refractive Error. Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research, 4(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-714379