Cosmopolitan Emancipation of Judges

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2014, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

This article seeks to identify characteristic features of judicial cosmopolitanism and its product - the emancipation of judges from the constraints of national law. Cosmopolitanism manifests itself in creating normative systems outside and above traditional international law. While the latter draws its binding power from the will of states, cosmopolitan rules are usually created by private actors. Their binding power results predominantly from practical necessity. Such is the status of lex sportiva, of the standards imposed by rating agencies, or of international accreditation bodies. Judicial cosmopolitanism is different, for it rests upon the existing structures and competencies. By resorting to alien legal sources judges free themselves from national constraints, thus enhancing their power and independence. In assessing the impact of cosmopolitanism, one has to differentiate between looking up to foreign laws and precedents as binding sources, and treating them as merely intellectual inspiration. The first approach is extremely rare, and constitutionally prohibited in most jurisdictions. The second, albeit it seems innocuous, entails serious perils to the quality of adjudication. It creates a danger of cherry-picking by selecting foreign inspirations, not necessarily best suited to the case at hand. More often than not, invoking foreign sources is superficial, conducted without even rudimentary knowledge of their systemic background. Also, there is a danger of judicial overstepping of powers by making laws instead of merely applying it. By allowing judges to venture the uncontrolled expansion of their powers we endanger the very essence of the rule of law. On a positive note, drawing on foreign legal sources enables judges to verify the rationality of their decisions, as they were already tested in other jurisdictions.

Authors and Affiliations

Waldemar Hoff

Keywords

Related Articles

When Justice Merely Becomes Intuition. On the Threats Related to the Application of Article 58 § 2 of the Civil Code in Social Security Law

The main aim of this paper is to consider the acceptability of application of Article 58 § 2 of the Polish Civil Code in the social security law in the regard to employment contract with pregnant women from the point of...

Zasadność ograniczeń funkcjonowania jednoosobowych spółek z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością

Artykuł porusza istotny problem ograniczeń prawnych, jakie obowiązujące przepisy narzucają jednoosobowym spółkom z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością. W pierwszej części autor bada obowiązujące normy dotyczące jednoosobowych...

Przywłaszczenie mienia w świetle małżeńskiej wspólności majątkowej

Dominujący pogląd zakłada, że możliwa jest odpowiedzialność karna osoby, która bez wiedzy współmałżonka zbywa rzecz ruchomą wchodzącą w skład małżeńskiej wspólności majątkowej. Pogląd ten jest nieprawidłowy. W rzeczywist...

The Taiwan Problem: Two China or One China

The difficult history of Taiwan has preoccupied politicians and scholars for the better part of the last century and is unlikely to be unraveled in the near future. The main issue is the following: are there two separate...

The concept of finality of an administrative decision in view of filing a petition for reconsideration of a case

Legal certainty, internal consistency and stability of regulation play a leading role in the process and the effectiveness of law’s use. This article is devoted to the issues accompanying determining the nature of the in...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP62468
  • DOI -
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Waldemar Hoff (2014). Cosmopolitan Emancipation of Judges. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 6(1), 33-49. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-62468