Counterfactuality of the Ethical Norms of Higher Education

Journal Title: Future Human Image - Year 2017, Vol 7, Issue

Abstract

Usage of the counterfactuality as a term for marking the modality to some event becomes a new trend in social sciences. Recently this term was popular almost exclusively in psychology — especially in study of cognitive processes, but now it receive wide spectrum of interpretations: from economic to philosophical one. Most of such interpretations is concentrated near the problem of somebody’s attitude to situation that he or she was involved in. Meanwhile the term “counterfactuality” marks the real influence of the person on the course of events rather than his or her pure mental states. The person could change the future events due to his or her activity about these events: these changes rarely could be exactly the same that were calculated, desirable or even acceptable for this person, but these changes are for sure the consequence of his or her decision — direct or indirect, substantial or accidental, necessary or extraneous, evidently relevant or seemingly unrelated. For the philosophy the situation with ethical optation and its consequences is significant. Typical for analytic philosophy is the reconstruction of positivist logic of counterfactuality as possibility. According to this positivist point of view, we should not accept any human discovery, any creation because of their improbability — the sentences about them were simply the consequences of false sentences. More important is the fact that the consequents of the counterfactual conditional judgments are always true. Nobody can take the antecedent of the counterfactual conditional judgments as false from the point of view of human will, i.e. from the point of view of our intention and results of its implementation in our activity and our creations. These consequences are real because men act according to their definition of situation: their belief motivates them and push them to make real things that were unreal before. Reality of mind becomes real materially due to human activity. This is the way of design of future human nature on the basis of future human image

Authors and Affiliations

Natalia Boychenko

Keywords

Related Articles

Symbolism of Auto-Descriptions of Modern Human: Anthropology as a Narrative Ontology

The purpose of the article is to investigate the content of the principal intentions of interpreting the symbol in the context of the anthropology of culture and philosophical anthropology and their correlation with the...

Science Education as a Response to the Needs of the Modern Open “Education for Everyone” System

The aim of this work is to analyze the suitability of Science Education in teaching pupils with different educational needs. In the open education, the most important is to understand that the effectiveness of education...

Counterfactuality of the Ethical Norms of Higher Education

Usage of the counterfactuality as a term for marking the modality to some event becomes a new trend in social sciences. Recently this term was popular almost exclusively in psychology — especially in study of cognitive p...

A Look at Informal Logic

The challenges of the global time require new solutions and up-to-date ways of thinking and communication. These challenges call for the ability to use critical thinking to face the ever-changing world and the ability to...

An Analysis of Polish Teachers Attitudes towards Inclusive Education

The purpose of the study was to determine the relation to inclusive education involving teachers of both public and special schools. The study was conducted on a sample of 224 teachers. In the study, a diagnostic survey...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP245894
  • DOI -
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Natalia Boychenko (2017). Counterfactuality of the Ethical Norms of Higher Education. Future Human Image, 7(), 28-35. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-245894