Critical review of a scientific publication: An insight

Journal Title: International Journal of Advanced Community Medicine - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 1

Abstract

The ever-increasing number of scientific publications has made the critical review/appraisal of articles necessary to weed out the irrelevant scientific publications as well as to remain up to date. The aim of this article is to present the concepts and principles of reviewing a scientific publication and it will be helpful to researchers, authors and reviewers in writing/evaluating a scientific publication. The article provides a detailed review of all the structural head of a manuscript {title, abstract and keywords, main text (introduction, methods, results, and discussion), conclusion, references, tables and figures}. Can be the decisive factor about the merit of the article. The title should be attractive, provoke curiosity, simple, concise and easily understandable without jargon while the abstract is a concise & accurate summary of the publication. Introduction: Is the brief description of the subject matter of the scientific publication, contains the present state of knowledge, and should progress from the general to the more specific. Rationale/ justification of the investigation should be clearly laid out in this part. Methodology: Describes what has been done, how it has been done and what does the authors looked for. It describes the various stages of planning, type of study sample, conduction of the study and the statistical part. Results: Show “what the authors have found?” and should reveal the points raised in the methodology, results for end points, reporting of statistical significance and other observations. Discussion: This section discusses and interprets the study findings and puts the findings in the proper perspective in the light of available literature on the study. This section compares the findings of the study with the status quo and odes the critical analysis of study limitations. Conclusions: Include the most important relevant logically derived interpretation of the study.

Authors and Affiliations

Mishra S, Chopra D, Jauhari N

Keywords

Related Articles

A cost evalauation analysis of treatment strategy in re-exposure animal bite cases

Background: The occurrence of repeat exposures to animal bite is quite common. Economic evaluations of such interventions are important tools for informing health policy. Objective: A cost analysis was carried out to com...

Critical review of a scientific publication: An insight

The ever-increasing number of scientific publications has made the critical review/appraisal of articles necessary to weed out the irrelevant scientific publications as well as to remain up to date. The aim of this artic...

Knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy and practice of standard precaution measures by nursing and midwifery students in Damaturu, North-Eastern Nigeria

It is expected that the habit of observing standard precaution measures among nurses should have been developed during the course of their training in school. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge, attitud...

Improvident maternity and its associated factors in urban slums of Chandigarh

Background: Population explosions in developing countries are the major problem which neutralizes all the gains and developments achieved in the country. High fertility levels and undesired births existing in India lead...

Case reports on malaria among tribal population in East Godavari district

Malaria is an age old disease. In Andhra Pradesh East Godavari District contributes to 5193 cases in 2010. Malaria is highly endemic in tribal population were API > 5. East Godavari District was composed with a populatio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP494559
  • DOI -
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mishra S, Chopra D, Jauhari N (2018). Critical review of a scientific publication: An insight. International Journal of Advanced Community Medicine, 1(1), 10-13. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-494559