Critical review of a scientific publication: An insight

Journal Title: International Journal of Advanced Community Medicine - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 1

Abstract

The ever-increasing number of scientific publications has made the critical review/appraisal of articles necessary to weed out the irrelevant scientific publications as well as to remain up to date. The aim of this article is to present the concepts and principles of reviewing a scientific publication and it will be helpful to researchers, authors and reviewers in writing/evaluating a scientific publication. The article provides a detailed review of all the structural head of a manuscript {title, abstract and keywords, main text (introduction, methods, results, and discussion), conclusion, references, tables and figures}. Can be the decisive factor about the merit of the article. The title should be attractive, provoke curiosity, simple, concise and easily understandable without jargon while the abstract is a concise & accurate summary of the publication. Introduction: Is the brief description of the subject matter of the scientific publication, contains the present state of knowledge, and should progress from the general to the more specific. Rationale/ justification of the investigation should be clearly laid out in this part. Methodology: Describes what has been done, how it has been done and what does the authors looked for. It describes the various stages of planning, type of study sample, conduction of the study and the statistical part. Results: Show “what the authors have found?” and should reveal the points raised in the methodology, results for end points, reporting of statistical significance and other observations. Discussion: This section discusses and interprets the study findings and puts the findings in the proper perspective in the light of available literature on the study. This section compares the findings of the study with the status quo and odes the critical analysis of study limitations. Conclusions: Include the most important relevant logically derived interpretation of the study.

Authors and Affiliations

Mishra S, Chopra D, Jauhari N

Keywords

Related Articles

Benign prostatic hyperplasia with respect to diet

Benign Prostatic hyperplasia is not a cancerous, but it is a condition in a men in which prostatic gland enlarged. In which the gland pinches the urethra, so that the bladder becomes thicker, eventually bladder becomes w...

Zika virus disease

ZIKV (Zika virus) is first major infectious disease related to human birth defects. ZIKV is flavivirus, family Flaviviridae causally associated with Guillain-Barre´ Syndrome, fetal microcephaly and other birth defects. Z...

Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards the mentally-ill in Lagos, South-Western Nigeria

Background: One of the foremost hindrances preventing appropriate mental health service delivery in developing countries is the limited knowledge of the general population about mental disorders which often leads to soci...

Study of aqueous extract of leaves of Psidium guajava as an anti-solar agent

Objective: The present study aimed at the phytochemical examination and anti-solar activity of Psidium guajava (leaf) aqueous extract has more flavonoid content based on this chemical substance photo protective activity...

Occupational risk of HCV infection among slaughter house workers

Objectives: To investigate the risk of HCV infection among slaughter house workers (SHWs). Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 369 SHWs recruited from 3 governorates. A pre-questionnaire was filled. HCV antibody...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP494559
  • DOI -
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mishra S, Chopra D, Jauhari N (2018). Critical review of a scientific publication: An insight. International Journal of Advanced Community Medicine, 1(1), 10-13. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-494559