Cue integration vs. exemplar-based reasoning in multi-attribute decisions from memory: A matter of cue representation
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 5
Abstract
Inferences about target variables can be achieved by deliberate integration of probabilistic cues or by retrieving similar cue-patterns (exemplars) from memory. In tasks with cue information presented in on-screen displays, rule-based strategies tend to dominate unless the abstraction of cue-target relations is unfeasible. This dominance has also been demonstrated — surprisingly — in experiments that demanded the retrieval of cue values from memory (M. Persson & J. Rieskamp, 2009). In three modified replications involving a fictitious disease, binary cue values were represented either by alternative symptoms (e.g., fever vs. hypothermia) or by symptom presence vs. absence (e.g., fever vs. no fever). The former representation might hinder cue abstraction. The cues were predictive of the severity of the disease, and participants had to infer in each trial who of two patients was sicker. Both experiments replicated the rule-dominance with present-absent cues but yielded higher percentages of exemplar-based strategies with alternative cues. The experiments demonstrate that a change in cue representation may induce a dramatic shift from rule-based to exemplar-based reasoning in formally identical tasks.
Authors and Affiliations
Arndt Bröder, Ben R. Newell and Christine Platzer
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677748
- DOI -
- Views 160
- Downloads 0
On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage
Are difficult decisions best made after a momentary diversion of thought? Previous research addressing this important question has yielded dozens of experiments in which participants were asked to choose the best of seve...
Enlarging the market yet decreasing the profit: An experimental study of competitive behavior when investment affects the prize
In many competitive situations, our investments increase our gains: Developing better products or research proposals may lead to higher contracts or patents or larger grants. Does increasing investment in such cases alwa...
A reason-based explanation for moral dumbfounding
The moral dumbfounding phenomenon for harmless taboo violations is often cited as a critical piece of empirical evidence motivating anti-rationalist models of moral judgment and decision-making. Moral dumbfounding purpor...
The Regret and Disappointment Scale: An instrument for assessing regret and disappointment in decision making
The present article investigates the effectiveness of methods traditionally used to distinguish between the emotions of regret and disappointment and presents a new method — the Regret and Disappointment Scale (RDS) — fo...
Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
Risk attitudes implied by valuations of risk-increasing assets depart markedly from those implied by valuations of risk-reducing assets. For instance, many are unwilling to pay the expected value for a risky asset or for...