Czy Akwinata stał się woluntarystą. Kilka obserwacji na temat wciąż niezakończonego sporu
Journal Title: Przegląd Tomistyczny - Year 2016, Vol 0, Issue
Abstract
The paper deals with the widely-discussed problem of the change in Aquinas’s interpretation of the relationship between the intellect and the will. The change may be located in his work around 1270, between the Prima Pars and the Prima Secundae/De malo 6. It comprises three main elements. (1) At the beginning, Thomas explains the role of the intellect in the act of liberum arbitrium by final causality and the role of the will by efficiency; after the change of his position, the role of the intellect is understood by formal causality and the role of the will by final causality. (2) After the change, the will is described as having the capacity to be a source of motion on its own (not only responding to the activity of the intellect). (3) It is the will and not the intellect, according to Aquinas’s later interpretation, that is set in motion by the first cause. The paper presents the discussion on the divergent interpretations of the above-mentioned evolution, begun by several famous texts by Otto Lottin in the 1920s and 1930s and followed up by a book by Yul Kim published in 2007. The new position adapted by Aquinas at the end of his career has been evaluated as a voluntaristic one, an intellectualistic one, or as some sort of middle position. Taking into account that (1) Thomas consistently understands the act of liberum arbitrium as the unique act of the intellect and the will operating together, (2) Aquinas’s philosophy of action is never prone to deterministic Aristotelianism and (3) for Aquinas, the first cause, always understood as transcendent, cannot be a danger to human freedom, it can therefore be concluded that the position adapted by Thomas after 1270 remains in substantial agreement with his former interpretation. The act of liberum arbitrium is rooted in the will. If one wants to judge Aquinas’s position according to this aspect, it should be labelled voluntarism. But the act of liberum arbitrium cannot be executed without the cooperation of the intellect; according to Aquinas it is never the result of some blind force. If one wants to focus on this aspect, one must describe Thomas’s solution as intellectualism. As mentioned above, the act of liberum arbitrium is the unique act of the intellect and the will operating together. If one wants to consider that aspect as the most important, one will probably be inclined to describe Aquinas’s position as a middle one between voluntarism and intellectualism. What is most important is that each of the above-mentioned descriptions of Aquinas’s position is the same before and after the change.
Authors and Affiliations
Michał Paluch
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP192010
- DOI -
- Views 80
- Downloads 0
Akt i możność w poznaniu anielskim według Tomasza z Akwinu
The topic of this paper is Aquinas’ doctrine of angelic cognition. Its point of departure is the importance of the opposition between actuality and potentiality in angelic cognition. Th is perspective enables us to see h...
Das Synodal- und Reformpredigtwesen in den Gärungsprozessen im spätmittelalterlichen Böhmen
Rapid development caused by, among other things, the constitution of the University of Prague and the establishment of the local church province, occurred in the mid-fourteenth century in the Kingdom of Bohemia, the crad...
O edycji komentarzy Waltera Burleya do Parva naturalia
Walter Burley was an English philosopher and theologian active in the first half of the fourteenth century. He is best known for his contributions to logic and the philosophy of nature. His five commentaries on the Parva n...
A supremely idle question? Issues of the beatific vision debate between 1331-1336
The beatific vision debate (1331–1336) presents two problems. First, what could have been the motivation of Pope John XXII for raising the issue? Second, why was his proposed theology of the delayed vision rejected nearl...
Stephen Langton and Geoffrey of Poitiers on the Natural Power to Believe
The article discusses the problem of the natural potentiality involved in faith. Stephen Langton and his disciple, Geoffrey of Poitiers, defend the view that the human being has a natural ability to believe, and by belie...