Czy Jezus akceptował rozwód?
Journal Title: Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny - Year 2014, Vol 0, Issue 1
Abstract
In the paper, the Jesus’ view on divorces is analyzed. Under the question was an “exception” which is derived usually from the clause “except it be for fornication” (Math. 19:9) and interpreted as a possibility to accept divorces. The phrase was put into Hebrew/Aramaic context of 1 st century Judaism and Jewish mentality of the presumed readers of the Matthew Gospel (the phrase never occurs in any other book of the New Testament). Next, wide view of the Talmudic arguments on the divorce issue was given to understand what the Pharisees could have meant asking for “divorce causes.” The cause of fornica- tion (adultery) was analyzed separately as it was viewed by Jewish Law and rabbis, and then the Jesus’ opinion was interpreted in the proper context. The conclusion is that Jesus even adding this “exception” never meant a possibility to accept a divorce under any condition.
Authors and Affiliations
Mirosław Rucki
Radość prawdy
none
Jacek Kiciński CMF Duchowość misji współdzielonej. Studium w świetle współczesnego Magisterium Kościoła Wrocław 2013, ss. 255
brak
Motywacja soteriologiczna w hymnie chrzcielnym w Tt 2, 11-14; 3, 4-7
As one washed in the water of new life, a Christian must become a new person. The ethical imperatives which must guide the new Christian can be found in the baptismal hymn in the Letter to Titus 2:11-14; 3:4-7, where St...
Czy Jezus akceptował rozwód?
In the paper, the Jesus’ view on divorces is analyzed. Under the question was an “exception” which is derived usually from the clause “except it be for fornication” (Math. 19:9) and interpreted as a possibility to accept...
Troska biskupa Wawrzyńca o należne Kościołowi wrocławskiemu dziesięciny
In the thirteenth century hierarchs of the church of the diocese of Silesia strove for church liberation from the sovereign power of the state, to obtain complete autonomous individuality, to subject the state and societ...